Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait

Feedback is an important feature of simulation-based education. This study investigated the optimal timing of feedback for technical skills learning in novices. Thirty novice endoscopists were pretested on a colonoscopy simulator task. Participants then received feedback either during (concurrent) o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic Medicine 2009-10, Vol.84 (10 Suppl), p.S54-S57
Hauptverfasser: Walsh, Catharine M, Ling, Simon C, Wang, Charlie S, Carnahan, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Feedback is an important feature of simulation-based education. This study investigated the optimal timing of feedback for technical skills learning in novices. Thirty novice endoscopists were pretested on a colonoscopy simulator task. Participants then received feedback either during (concurrent) or after (terminal) each of their 12 practice trials. Effectiveness of training was assessed using an immediate posttest and one week later on retention and transfer tests. Measures included execution time and blinded expert assessments. Both groups performed similarly on the pre-, post-, and retention tests. At transfer, the terminal feedback group performed significantly better as measured by execution time, checklist, and global rating scores. The concurrent feedback group's performance decreased significantly on the transfer test as compared with the posttest and retention test. Not all feedback conditions seem equally effective. The use of terminal feedback resulted in better learning as demonstrated by superior performance during transfer.
ISSN:1040-2446
1938-808X
DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf