Thermodynamic Constraints on Reflectance Reciprocity and Kirchhoff's Law

Contrary to common belief, neither reciprocity of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) nor the directional form of Kirchhoff's electromagnetic radiation law can be demonstrated on the basis of energy conservation. The BRDF is generally considered reciprocal as an extension...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Optics 1998-06, Vol.37 (16), p.3464-3470
Hauptverfasser: Snyder, W C, Wan, Z, Li, X
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contrary to common belief, neither reciprocity of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) nor the directional form of Kirchhoff's electromagnetic radiation law can be demonstrated on the basis of energy conservation. The BRDF is generally considered reciprocal as an extension of Helmholtz reciprocity, but Helmholtz reciprocity does not always hold. We describe the flaw in a thermodynamic demonstration of reciprocity that uses an enclosure calculation. Some conclusions can be drawn from the enclosure calculation, but reciprocity requires more restrictive conditions. We conclude that, although they can be violated, reciprocity and the directional form of Kirchhoff's law generally hold because of the quantum-mechanical principle of time-reversal invariance, which applies to most materials.
ISSN:1559-128X
0003-6935
1539-4522
DOI:10.1364/AO.37.003464