Imaging of Soft Tissues Adjacent to Orthopedic Hardware: Comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI
The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact reduction techniques at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. A titanium plate with steel screws was placed in a freshly harvested pig leg. The leg was imaged with 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. A T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was used with echo-train lengths of 8, 16...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2010-01, Vol.194 (1), p.W60-W64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact reduction techniques at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI.
A titanium plate with steel screws was placed in a freshly harvested pig leg. The leg was imaged with 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. A T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was used with echo-train lengths of 8, 16, 32, and 64 and a constant readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz. The images were compared qualitatively, and the optimal echo-train length was selected. Images were acquired at the optimal echo-train length with four different readout bandwidths. Artifact was measured quantitatively, and image quality was ranked qualitatively. The qualitatively best image acquired at 1.5 T was compared with the qualitatively highest-ranked image acquired at 3 T.
At both 1.5 T and 3 T, optimal images of equal quality were produced at echo-train lengths of 8 and 16. At higher readout bandwidths, there was quantitatively less artifact. The qualitatively best images were acquired at a readout bandwidth of 31.2 kHz at 1.5 T and 62.5 kHz at 3 T (Cronbach's alpha=1.00). The optimal image at 3 T was qualitatively superior to that at 1.5 T.
Optimizing image acquisition parameters in this phantom model resulted in similar quantitative susceptibility artifact at 3 T and 1.5 T and better qualitative images at 3 T than at 1.5 T. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
DOI: | 10.2214/AJR.08.1740 |