Influence of plasma exchange on the disposition of the fourth generation cephalosporin cefepime

Cefepime, a fourth generation cephalosporin, is widely used in hematology and oncology patients. These patients may require plasma exchange (PE) for indications such as chemotherapy- or cancer-induced thromobotic thrombocytopenic purpura to name a few. To date, no pharmacokinetic evaluation has been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2009-12, Vol.15 (4), p.217-222
Hauptverfasser: Ibrahim, Rami B, Liu, Chin Y, Cronin, Simon M, Murphy, Bridgette C, Cha, Raymond, Swerdlow, Paul, Avila, Tomoco, Smith, Stephen T, Lewis, Richard A, Edwards, David J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cefepime, a fourth generation cephalosporin, is widely used in hematology and oncology patients. These patients may require plasma exchange (PE) for indications such as chemotherapy- or cancer-induced thromobotic thrombocytopenic purpura to name a few. To date, no pharmacokinetic evaluation has been conducted assessing cefepime’s disposition during PE. A 2 g IV cefepime single dose was given to patients undergoing therapeutic PE. Two hours from cefepime dose administration, plasma concentration was measured. PE was then instituted and cefepime plasmapheresate concentration was measured at the completion of the PE session. Cefepime levels were measured using HPLC. The percentage removed by PE was calculated as: amount removed/2 g dose. Ten adult patients were analyzed: median age (range): 52 years (33—67) and median weight (range); 82.85 kg (47—120). PE indications were: myasthenia gravis (n = 3), transverse myelitis (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (n = 1), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 1), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 1), and humoral rejection post cadaveric renal allograft (n = 1). All patients except one had a creatinine clearance >60 mL/min. One patient was excluded from the pharmacokinetic analysis owing to loss of venous access during PE. For the remaining nine patients, total plasma volume removed was 3.5 L (range: 2.5—3.5) and duration of PE was 120 min (range: 94—209). The cefepime removed by PE was 3.7% (range: 2.1—6.7). A strong correlation was found between cefepime plasma concentration prior to PE and the amount of drug removed (r = 0.96, r2 = 0.92; p
ISSN:1078-1552
1477-092X
DOI:10.1177/1078155209103103