Perinatal outcome in singletons after modified natural cycle IVF and standard IVF with ovarian stimulation

Abstract Objective Singletons born after IVF treatment are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, the cause of which is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of ovarian stimulation on perinatal outcome. Study design In this single-centre retrospective study, perinata...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2010-01, Vol.148 (1), p.56-61
Hauptverfasser: Pelinck, Marie-José, Keizer, Marjan H, Hoek, Annemieke, Simons, Arnold H.M, Schelling, Karin, Middelburg, Karin, Heineman, Maas Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Singletons born after IVF treatment are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, the cause of which is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of ovarian stimulation on perinatal outcome. Study design In this single-centre retrospective study, perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF treatment with ( n = 106) and without ovarian stimulation ( n = 84) were compared. For IVF without ovarian stimulation, a modified natural cycle protocol was used. Results No differences were found in pregnancy duration, proportion of prematurity and proportion of low birth weight. Mean birth weight of modified natural cycle vs standard IVF singletons was 3485 (±527) vs 3218 (±670) g; P = 0.003. After adjustment for prognostic factors by linear regression analysis, the difference in birth weight remaining was 134 g; P = 0.045. Conclusions Birth weights of modified natural cycle IVF singletons found in this study are higher than standard IVF singletons, suggesting that ovarian stimulation may be a causative factor in the occurrence of low birth weight in standard IVF.
ISSN:0301-2115
1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.015