Comparative Cell-Mediated Immunogenicity of DNA/DNA, DNA/Adenovirus Type 5 (Ad5), or Ad5/Ad5 HIV-1 Clade B gag Vaccine Prime-Boost Regimens

BackgroundWe report composite results from the Merck phase I program of near-consensus clade B human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 gag vaccines MethodsHealthy HIV-uninfected adults were enrolled in 6 blinded placebo-controlled studies evaluating the immunogenicity of (1) a 4-dose regimen of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infectious diseases 2010-01, Vol.201 (1), p.132-141
Hauptverfasser: Asmuth, David M., Brown, Elizabeth L., DiNubile, Mark J., Sun, Xiao, del Rio, Carlos, Harro, Clayton, Keefer, Michael C., Kublin, James G., Dubey, Sheri A., Kierstead, Lisa S., Casimiro, Danilo R., Shiver, John W., Robertson, Michael N., Quirk, Erin K., Mehrotra, Devan V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundWe report composite results from the Merck phase I program of near-consensus clade B human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 gag vaccines MethodsHealthy HIV-uninfected adults were enrolled in 6 blinded placebo-controlled studies evaluating the immunogenicity of (1) a 4-dose regimen of a DNA vaccine, (2) a 3-dose priming regimen of the DNA vaccine with a booster dose of an adenovirus type 5 (Ad5)-vectored vaccine, or (3) a 3-dose regimen of the Ad5 vaccine. The DNA plasmid was provided with or without an aluminum phosphate or CRL1005 adjuvant. The primary end point was the unfractionated HIV-1 gag-specific interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) response 4 weeks after the final dose ResultsOverall, 254 (83%) of 307 subjects randomized to the vaccine groups were evaluable. Adjuvants did not enhance immunogenicity of the DNA vaccine. Postboost ELISpot responder frequencies were higher for Ad5-containing regimens than for the DNA/DNA regimen (33%) but were similar for DNA/Ad5 (55%) and Ad5/Ad5 (50%). DNA/DNA elicited mainly a CD4 response, whereas Ad5/Ad5 elicited mainly a CD8 response; DNA/Ad5 generated CD4 and CD8 responses comparable to those of DNA/DNA and Ad5/Ad5, respectively ConclusionsThe DNA vaccine alone or as a priming regimen for the Ad5 vaccine did not increase unfractionated ELISpot responses compared with the Ad5 vaccine alone. Qualitative T cell responses to different vaccine regimens deserve further study
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/648591