Cost comparison of curative therapies for localized prostate cancer in Japan: a single-institution experience

Purpose In addition to open surgery, curative therapies for prostate cancer now include endoscopic surgery and radiation therapies. Because of the expansion and subdivision of treatment methods for prostate cancer, the medical fee point schedule in Japan was revised in fiscal year 2006. We examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese Journal of Radiology 2009-11, Vol.27 (9), p.348-354
Hauptverfasser: Satoh, Takefumi, Ishiyama, Hiromichi, Matsumoto, Kazumasa, Tabata, Ken-ichi, Kitano, Masashi, Iwamura, Masatsugu, Kimura, Masaki, Minamida, Satoru, Yamashita, Hideyuki, Matsuda, Daisuke, Kotani, Shouko, Niibe, Yuzuru, Uemae, Mineko, Hayakawa, Kazushige, Baba, Shiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose In addition to open surgery, curative therapies for prostate cancer now include endoscopic surgery and radiation therapies. Because of the expansion and subdivision of treatment methods for prostate cancer, the medical fee point schedule in Japan was revised in fiscal year 2006. We examined changes in medical income and expenditure after this revision of the medical fee system. Materials and methods We studied income and expenditure, after institution of the new medical fee schedule, for the five types of therapies for prostate cancer performed at our hospital: two surgical therapies (radical retropubic prostatectomy and laparoscopic prostatectomy) and three radiation therapies (three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 192 Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and 125 I low-dose-rate brachytherapy). Results Low-dose-rate brachytherapy was found to be associated with a profit of yy199 per patient. Laparoscopic prostatectomy, a highly advanced medical treatment that the fee revision changed from a partially insured to an insured procedure, yielded a profit of yy75 672 per patient. However, high-dose-rate brachytherapy was associated with a loss of yy654 016 per patient. Conclusion Given the loss in hospital income per patient undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy, the medical fee point system for this procedure should be reassessed.
ISSN:1867-1071
1862-5274
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-009-0356-x