Sociodemographic predictors of postvasectomy noncompliance

Abstract Background Postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is critical to establish the success of the vasectomy but the rate of compliance with PVSA is notoriously low. We determined various sociodemographic predictors of high noncompliance rate. Study design Retrospective chart review of 214 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2009-12, Vol.80 (6), p.566-568
Hauptverfasser: Sheynkin, Yefim, Mishail, Alek, Vemulapalli, Praneeth, Lee, Jacqueline, Ahn, Hongshik, Schulsinger, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is critical to establish the success of the vasectomy but the rate of compliance with PVSA is notoriously low. We determined various sociodemographic predictors of high noncompliance rate. Study design Retrospective chart review of 214 patients who have undergone vasectomy by one surgeon was performed. All men had similar preoperative consultation with written instruction to provide two PVSA 2 and 4 months after vasectomy. Noncompliance was defined as a failure to provide PVSA. Sociodemographic data including age, marital status, number of children, level of education and smoking history were analyzed. Results Of 214 patients, 99 (46.2%) provided no PVSA. Rate of noncompliance was independently higher in men with four or more children, smokers and those with lower educational level. Marital status and age had no impact on postoperative compliance Conclusion Objective sociodemographic variables were associated with a higher risk of PVSA noncompliance. A more thorough approach to vasectomy counseling and timely reminder of upcoming PVSA in a preoperatively defined group of patients will help to improve compliance and prevent possible medical and legal repercussions.
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.123