The value of surveillance mammography of the contralateral breast in patients with a history of breast cancer

Abstract Purpose To determine the contribution of surveillance mammography to the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) and to assess its impact on the survival of breast cancer patients with relation to compliance. Method Breast cancer patients (5589) were identified us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2009-11, Vol.45 (17), p.3000-3007
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Wenli, Schaapveld, Michael, Jansen, Liesbeth, Bagherzadegan, Emad, Sahinovic, Marko Mirza, Baas, Peter C, Hanssen, Leo M.H.C, van der Mijle, Hans C.J, Brandenburg, Jan D, Wiggers, Theo, De Bock, Geertruida H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose To determine the contribution of surveillance mammography to the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) and to assess its impact on the survival of breast cancer patients with relation to compliance. Method Breast cancer patients (5589) were identified using files from the regional cancer registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North Netherlands (CCCN Groningen, The Netherlands). The programme sensitivity and the impact on prognosis of follow-up mammography with relation to compliance were evaluated in 114 patients who developed MCBC during hospital follow-up. Results The cumulative MCBC incidence rate at year 10 was 3.4% (95% CI: 2.8–4.0%). The programme sensitivity of surveillance mammography was 59.6% (95% CI: 50.6–68.7). In patients who complied with annual mammography, sensitivity was increased to 70.8% (95% CI: 61.7–80.0). Patients with MCBCs detected by routine mammography have better survival rates than patients with MCBCs detected by other means (HR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.59–6.34). Though there was a trend towards improved survival in patients being compliant with regular clinical follow-up (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.72–3.96), this was not the case for patients being compliant with annual mammography (HR:1.02; 95% CI:0.50–2.09). Conclusion Mammography is a valuable tool for the early detection of MCBC during hospital follow-up of breast cancer patients and is probably beneficial to survival. The utilisation of follow-up surveillance in breast cancer patients and its potential impact on survival deserve further investigation.
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.08.007