Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
Objective We compared survival for women with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary radiation or radical hysterectomy. Study Design Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer were examined. Radical hysterectomy was comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2009-11, Vol.201 (5), p.485.e1-485.e9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective We compared survival for women with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary radiation or radical hysterectomy. Study Design Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer were examined. Radical hysterectomy was compared with primary combination external-beam and brachytherapy radiation. Results A total of 4885 patients were identified. Multivariate analysis showed that radical hysterectomy was associated with a 59% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.50). After stratification by tumor size, hysterectomy was associated with a 62% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30–0.48) for tumors that were 6 cm in size, survival was equivalent between radical hysterectomy and radiation. Conclusion Our data indicate that, in women with cervical cancer lesions of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.015 |