A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic supracervical and total hysterectomy

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcome measures of laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) and total hysterectomies (TLH). Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of 1016 LSHs and TLHs at a tertiary medical center between November 1999 and August 2008 in a multivaria...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2009-11, Vol.201 (5), p.536.e1-536.e7
Hauptverfasser: Harmanli, Ozgur H., MD, Tunitsky, Elena, MD, Esin, Sertac, MD, Citil, Ayse, MD, Knee, Alexander, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcome measures of laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) and total hysterectomies (TLH). Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of 1016 LSHs and TLHs at a tertiary medical center between November 1999 and August 2008 in a multivariate logistic regression model. Results Overall, the groups were similar. Most of the perioperative outcome measures did not differ statistically between the groups. However, the risk of serious complications was higher for TLH (5.8% vs 2.5%; odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35–5.49). Specifically, urinary tract injury occurred more frequently in TLH (2.2% vs 0.5%; OR, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.21–18.56). Conversion to laparotomy was significantly more common in TLH (5.8% vs 4.1%; OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.20–4.22). Conclusion In this largest comparison, short-term morbidity of TLH and LSH is overall similar. TLH presents a clinically small, but statistically significant, increased risk of urinary tract injury and conversion to laparotomy.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.048