Long-Term Complication Rates and Survival of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: The Role of Percutaneous Versus Surgical Placement

Considerable controversy currently exists in the literature concerning the mode of catheter placement and its impact on the technical success of peritoneal dialysis (PD). We decided to compare the impact of the surgical versus the percutaneous insertion technique on peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in dialysis 2009-09, Vol.22 (5), p.569-575
Hauptverfasser: Perakis, Kostas E., Stylianou, Kostas G., Kyriazis, John P., Mavroeidi, Vasiliki N., Katsipi, Irene G., Vardaki, Eleftheria A., Petrakis, Ioannis G., Stratigis, Spyros, Kroustalakis, Nikos G., Alegakis, Athanasios K., Daphnis, Eugene K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Considerable controversy currently exists in the literature concerning the mode of catheter placement and its impact on the technical success of peritoneal dialysis (PD). We decided to compare the impact of the surgical versus the percutaneous insertion technique on peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDCs) complications and survival. Our study population comprised 152 patients in whom 170 PDCs were inserted between January 1990 and December 2007 at the main PD unit on the island of Crete. Eighty four catheters were surgically placed (S group) and 86 were placed percutaneously by nephrologists (N group). The total experience accumulated was 4997 patient‐months. The overall complications did not differ between the two groups. Only early leakage was more frequent in N group than S group (10.3 versus 1.9 episodes per 1000 patient‐months; p 
ISSN:0894-0959
1525-139X
DOI:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00621.x