The Effect of Argon and Nitrogen Ion Implantation on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments

Abstract Introduction This qualitative study investigated the effect of N2+ and Ar+ ion implantation on morphologic alterations and fatigue resistance in Pro Taper S1 NiTi (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) rotary instruments. Methods Instruments were divided into three groups: N2+ implan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2009-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1558-1562
Hauptverfasser: Wolle, Carlos Frederico Brilhante, MSc, Vasconcellos, Marcos Antônio Zen, PhD, Hinrichs, Ruth, PhD, Becker, Alex Niederauer, MSc, Barletta, Fernando Branco, DMD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction This qualitative study investigated the effect of N2+ and Ar+ ion implantation on morphologic alterations and fatigue resistance in Pro Taper S1 NiTi (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) rotary instruments. Methods Instruments were divided into three groups: N2+ implanted, Ar+ implanted, and unmodified control group. All instruments were used to prepare five curved canals in epoxy resin blocks with brushing motion. The instruments were examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) before use, after first use, and after the fifth use. A more demanding cyclic fatigue test was undertaken, submitting the instruments to 15-second periods of continuous rotation inside the curved canals without a brushing motion. Crack formation was analyzed with the SEM, and the number of 15-second periods required to fracture each instrument was recorded. Results No significant morphologic alterations were observed in the instruments after the preparation of five canals. Crack density was similar in all groups. In the subsequent cyclic fatigue test, instruments implanted with nitrogen performed worse than those implanted with argon and the control group. Fracture faces show differences in the fracture modes. Conclusions Ar+ implantation improved the performance of S1 files moderately, whereas nitrogen ion–implanted files performed worse in the fatigue test. A reduction in file performance seems to be caused by nitrogen diffusion in the grain boundaries, instead of the desired improvement caused by titanium nitride formation.
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.023