Enantioselective analysis of R- and S-propafenone in plasma by HPLC applying column switching and liquid–liquid extraction

Two HPLC methods are described for the enantioselective analysis of R- and S-propafenone in plasma. In a column switching approach, centrifuged plasma was injected onto a silica-based strong acid cation-exchanger and the fraction containing propafenone was switched on-line onto an enantioselective C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2009-11, Vol.877 (29), p.3489-3494
Hauptverfasser: Lamprecht, G., Stoschitzky, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two HPLC methods are described for the enantioselective analysis of R- and S-propafenone in plasma. In a column switching approach, centrifuged plasma was injected onto a silica-based strong acid cation-exchanger and the fraction containing propafenone was switched on-line onto an enantioselective Chiralcel column for separation of the enantiomers. In another approach, propafenone was extracted from plasma by liquid–liquid extraction at pH 11.4. The extracted components were transferred into aqueous medium and separated on a Chiralcel ODR. Both methods were validated and showed comparable performance. Within-day and between-day precision was better than 5% for both methods. Linear calibration functions were obtained ( r 2 > 0.999), and the limit of detection for each enantiomer was 0.2 μg/mL for column switching and 0.55 μg/mL for liquid–liquid extraction. The analysis methods were applied for the determination of the effect of physical exercise on the enantiomeric ratio of R- and S-propafenone in plasma of healthy volunteers. During exercise, the concentration of both enantiomers reached a maximum, followed by a significant decrease during recovery.
ISSN:1570-0232
1873-376X
DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.08.024