The f/t-PSA ratio in diagnosis of in-patients and out-patients: a unitary cutoff value is not useful

Purpose In the prostate specific antigen (PSA) range of 4–10 ng/ml after a negative digital rectal examination, the PSA value indicates a lack of specificity with a carcinoma detection rate of roughly 20%. To improve the biopsy/carcinoma ratio, the interdisciplinary consensus recommends free PSA (fP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2009-10, Vol.27 (5), p.581-585
Hauptverfasser: Börgermann, C., Swoboda, A., Luboldt, H.-J., vom Dorp, F., Rübben, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose In the prostate specific antigen (PSA) range of 4–10 ng/ml after a negative digital rectal examination, the PSA value indicates a lack of specificity with a carcinoma detection rate of roughly 20%. To improve the biopsy/carcinoma ratio, the interdisciplinary consensus recommends free PSA (fPSA) measurement. This does not take into account the pre-analysis when the cutoff value is established for biopsy indication. Methods In the present study, an in-patient cohort whose blood samples were immediately analysed was compared with an out-patient cohort whose sample processing was delayed by between 24 and 48 h. Results The in-patient cohort comprises 382 patients with 99 prostate carcinomas, the out-patient cohort 987 patients with 235 carcinomas. In the in-patient cohort a sensitivity of 90% with a cutoff value of 25% for the f/t-PSA ratios is achieved with the theoretical possibility of reducing the number of punch biopsies by 34.6%. A sensitivity of 90% in the out-patient cohort necessitates a cutoff value of 18% for the f/t-PSA ratios. The specificity is 35.3% with a possible biopsy reduction of 29.1%. Conclusions The cutoff values from cohorts with an immediate fPSA measurement cannot be adopted for a typical out-patient cohort whose analyses are delayed. On the contrary, an individual adjustment is necessary which corresponds to the pre-analysis.
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-009-0441-x