Reducing the negative effects of chemical polishing in acrylic resins by use of an additional cycle of polymerization
The chemical polishing of dentures and orthodontic appliances is an efficient and time-saving technique. However, the process may adversely affect the physical properties of resin. This study evaluated the effect of an additional polymerization cycle in a microwave or water bath on the physical prop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2003-06, Vol.89 (6), p.598-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The chemical polishing of dentures and orthodontic appliances is an efficient and time-saving technique. However, the process may adversely affect the physical properties of resin.
This study evaluated the effect of an additional polymerization cycle in a microwave or water bath on the physical properties of an autopolymerized acrylic resin submitted to chemical polishing.
Control groups comprised acrylic resin specimens submitted to mechanical (group 1) and chemical (group 2) polishing. Experimental groups comprised chemically polished specimens submitted to an additional cycle of polymerization in a microwave at 450 W for 3 minutes (group 3) or in a hot water bath at 65° C for 1 hour (group 4). For the residual monomer test, 10 standardized half-disc specimens (30 × 3 mm) were fabricated for each of the test groups, and daily ultraviolet spectrophotometric (206 nm) analyses were assessed for 13 days (μg/cm
2). For transverse strength and internal Knoop hardness (KH) tests, 10 (65 × 10 × 2.5 mm) and 5 (32 × 10 × 2.5 mm) specimens were fabricated for each test group, respectively. Internal Knoop hardness (kg/mm
2) was assessed at depths of 100, 700, and 1500 μm. Transverse strength (MPa) was measured with a 3-point bending test in a universal testing machine with a 10-kg load cell at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance, and the means were compared with Student’s
t test and Tukey-Kramer intervals (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00169-0 |