Evaluation of a new virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy

Background To determine realism and training capacity of HystSim, a new virtual-reality simulator for the training of hysteroscopic interventions. Methods Sixty-two gynaecological surgeons with various levels of expertise were interviewed at the 13 th Practical Course in Gynaecologic Endoscopy in Da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2009-09, Vol.23 (9), p.2026-2033
Hauptverfasser: Bajka, Michael, Tuchschmid, Stefan, Streich, Matthias, Fink, Daniel, Székely, Gábor, Harders, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To determine realism and training capacity of HystSim, a new virtual-reality simulator for the training of hysteroscopic interventions. Methods Sixty-two gynaecological surgeons with various levels of expertise were interviewed at the 13 th Practical Course in Gynaecologic Endoscopy in Davos, Switzerland. All participants received a 20-min hands-on training on the simulator and filled out a four-page questionnaire. Twenty-three questions with respect to the realism of the simulation and the training capacity were answered on a seven-point Likert scale along with 11 agree–disagree statements concerning the HystSim training in general. Results Twenty-six participants had performed more than 50 hysteroscopies (“experts”) and 36 equal to or fewer than 50 (“novices”). Four of 60 (6.6%) responding participants judged the overall impression as “7 – absolutely realistic”, 40 (66.6%) as “6 – realistic”, and 16 (26.6%) as “5 – somewhat realistic”. Novices (6.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.28–6.7) rated the overall training capacity significantly higher than experts (6.08; 95% CI 5.85–6.3), however, high-grade acceptance was found in both groups. In response to the statements, 95.2% believe that HystSim allows procedural training of diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy, and 85.5% suggest that HystSim training should be offered to all novices before performing surgery on real patients. Conclusion Face validity has been established for a new hysteroscopic surgery simulator. Potential trainees and trainers assess it to be a realistic and useful tool for the training of hysteroscopy. Further systematic validation studies are needed to clarify how this system can be optimally integrated into the gynaecological curriculum.
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-9927-7