Prospective Evaluation of Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs for Anterior Instability

Background Arthroscopic treatment has evolved to become the primary surgical option in the management of anterior shoulder instability as studies show comparable outcomes between open and arthroscopic techniques. Objective To evaluate prospectively the results of our institutional database for arthr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2010-02, Vol.38 (2), p.302-307
Hauptverfasser: Voos, James E., Livermore, Ryan W., Feeley, Brian T., Altchek, David W., Williams, Riley J., Warren, Russell F., Cordasco, Frank A., Allen, Answorth A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Arthroscopic treatment has evolved to become the primary surgical option in the management of anterior shoulder instability as studies show comparable outcomes between open and arthroscopic techniques. Objective To evaluate prospectively the results of our institutional database for arthroscopic Bankart repairs at a minimum 2-year follow-up for patients with anterior instability treated with suture anchors. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Eighty-three consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors. The mean age at the time of surgery was 33 years (range, 15–55 years). At an average follow-up of 33 months (range, 24–49 months), 73 patients (61 males, 12 females) were assessed with outcomes scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, L’Insalata, and visual analog scores. The rate of recurrent instability, range of motion, and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were evaluated. Results Thirteen patients (18%) suffered a recurrence after surgery. Seven patients (10%) had a subsequent dislocation and 6 (8%) a subluxation event or apprehension. Six of the 13 had a traumatic event that resulted in recurrent episodes of instability. Revision surgery was needed for 2 patients (3%) for instability and 2 for postoperative shoulder stiffness. On average there was no significant loss of external rotation postoperatively (average, 71° pre- and postoperatively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and L’Insalata scores improved from 75.4 to 94.9 and 66.5 to 90.9, respectively ( P
ISSN:0363-5465
1552-3365
DOI:10.1177/0363546509348049