Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery
Background: Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2010-04, Vol.38 (3), p.284-291 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 291 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 284 |
| container_title | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Mehta, Jignasa Farnell, Damian JJ Stappler, Theodore Liazos, Efstathios Wong, David |
| description | Background: Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors that influence the perception of tilt in the presence of residual cyclorotation following CRS.
Methods: Thirty‐four AMD patients treated with MTS and CRS were investigated; and all measurements were made preoperatively, and after each surgical procedure. Fundus photographs were analysed with computer software to determine the degree of retinal rotation and reliability was assessed by two independent assessors. The degree of perceptual rotation was measured with Maddox rod and the subjective appreciation of tilt was established by direct questioning. Fixation preference was determined by cover test and convergence. Bagolini glasses were used to determine binocular outcome.
Results: Post CRS, 20 of the 34 patients had adapted to tilt. There was a significant difference of 5° ± 7° (95% confidence intervals: 1–8°, t = 2.9, degree of freedom = 19, P = 0.008) between the degree of rotation measured from the fundus photographs and the Maddox rod measurement following CRS. Patients with residual retinal rotation less than or equal to 15° did not appreciate tilt in free space. More importantly, fixation with the operated eye and ignoring the image from the non‐operated eye was significantly associated with being free of tilt in natural viewing conditions (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02235.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733955354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733955354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3795-94fb785034070747ff27e095a0c0719a1c9cbbf6326e0d41dcf4b2aee8f780ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1v2zAQhomgRb7_QiEgQyc5xy9RGjI0RpoECJoWTZsiC0HRx0CuLLqkhNj_vlTseshULjyQz3t3eAjJKExoOufzCRWC5RUoOmGQXoExLierPXK4-3i3rQsB4oAcxTgHAMl4sU8OGAihKJOHRH7FYHHZN77LvMv6pu0z59vWvzTdc2b90PUY8uB784rEITxjWJ-Q9860EU-39zH58fnqYXqT391f304_3eWWq0rmlXC1KiVwAQqUUM4xhVBJAzYtWBlqK1vXruCsQJgJOrNO1Mwglk6VgIYfk4-bvsvg_wwYe71oosW2NR36IWrFeSUllyKRZ2_IuR9Cl5bTTFDOSuAFJKrcUDb4GAM6vQzNwoS1pqBHs3quR2l6FKhHs_rVrF6l6IftgKFe4GwX_KcyARcb4KVpcf3fjfX06n6sUj7f5JvY42qXN-G3LhRXUj9-udbfnr5f_vzFqX7ifwF6hJT7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413280360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mehta, Jignasa ; Farnell, Damian JJ ; Stappler, Theodore ; Liazos, Efstathios ; Wong, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Jignasa ; Farnell, Damian JJ ; Stappler, Theodore ; Liazos, Efstathios ; Wong, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors that influence the perception of tilt in the presence of residual cyclorotation following CRS.
Methods: Thirty‐four AMD patients treated with MTS and CRS were investigated; and all measurements were made preoperatively, and after each surgical procedure. Fundus photographs were analysed with computer software to determine the degree of retinal rotation and reliability was assessed by two independent assessors. The degree of perceptual rotation was measured with Maddox rod and the subjective appreciation of tilt was established by direct questioning. Fixation preference was determined by cover test and convergence. Bagolini glasses were used to determine binocular outcome.
Results: Post CRS, 20 of the 34 patients had adapted to tilt. There was a significant difference of 5° ± 7° (95% confidence intervals: 1–8°, t = 2.9, degree of freedom = 19, P = 0.008) between the degree of rotation measured from the fundus photographs and the Maddox rod measurement following CRS. Patients with residual retinal rotation less than or equal to 15° did not appreciate tilt in free space. More importantly, fixation with the operated eye and ignoring the image from the non‐operated eye was significantly associated with being free of tilt in natural viewing conditions (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the presence of residual cyclorotation of the macula following CRS of up to 27°, a significant proportion (59%) of patients did not perceive the world as tilted in natural viewing conditions. Differences between retinal rotation and perceptual tilt provide evidence of sensory adaptation. It was patients who fixed with their operated eye and ignored the image from the non‐operated eye who did not perceive tilt post CRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02235.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20447125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>adaptation ; age-related macular degeneration ; Binocular vision ; counter-rotation surgery ; Eye ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Humans ; Macula Lutea - surgery ; Macular degeneration ; Macular Degeneration - surgery ; Oculomotor Muscles - surgery ; Patients ; Perception ; Regression Analysis ; Retina ; Retina - surgery ; Rotation ; Surgery ; tilt ; Tilt-Table Test - methods ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Vision, Monocular ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2010-04, Vol.38 (3), p.284-291</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3795-94fb785034070747ff27e095a0c0719a1c9cbbf6326e0d41dcf4b2aee8f780ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2010.02235.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2010.02235.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20447125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Jignasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnell, Damian JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stappler, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liazos, Efstathios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery</title><title>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background: Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors that influence the perception of tilt in the presence of residual cyclorotation following CRS.
Methods: Thirty‐four AMD patients treated with MTS and CRS were investigated; and all measurements were made preoperatively, and after each surgical procedure. Fundus photographs were analysed with computer software to determine the degree of retinal rotation and reliability was assessed by two independent assessors. The degree of perceptual rotation was measured with Maddox rod and the subjective appreciation of tilt was established by direct questioning. Fixation preference was determined by cover test and convergence. Bagolini glasses were used to determine binocular outcome.
Results: Post CRS, 20 of the 34 patients had adapted to tilt. There was a significant difference of 5° ± 7° (95% confidence intervals: 1–8°, t = 2.9, degree of freedom = 19, P = 0.008) between the degree of rotation measured from the fundus photographs and the Maddox rod measurement following CRS. Patients with residual retinal rotation less than or equal to 15° did not appreciate tilt in free space. More importantly, fixation with the operated eye and ignoring the image from the non‐operated eye was significantly associated with being free of tilt in natural viewing conditions (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the presence of residual cyclorotation of the macula following CRS of up to 27°, a significant proportion (59%) of patients did not perceive the world as tilted in natural viewing conditions. Differences between retinal rotation and perceptual tilt provide evidence of sensory adaptation. It was patients who fixed with their operated eye and ignored the image from the non‐operated eye who did not perceive tilt post CRS.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>age-related macular degeneration</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>counter-rotation surgery</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macula Lutea - surgery</subject><subject>Macular degeneration</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - surgery</subject><subject>Oculomotor Muscles - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Retina - surgery</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>tilt</subject><subject>Tilt-Table Test - methods</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Vision, Monocular</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1v2zAQhomgRb7_QiEgQyc5xy9RGjI0RpoECJoWTZsiC0HRx0CuLLqkhNj_vlTseshULjyQz3t3eAjJKExoOufzCRWC5RUoOmGQXoExLierPXK4-3i3rQsB4oAcxTgHAMl4sU8OGAihKJOHRH7FYHHZN77LvMv6pu0z59vWvzTdc2b90PUY8uB784rEITxjWJ-Q9860EU-39zH58fnqYXqT391f304_3eWWq0rmlXC1KiVwAQqUUM4xhVBJAzYtWBlqK1vXruCsQJgJOrNO1Mwglk6VgIYfk4-bvsvg_wwYe71oosW2NR36IWrFeSUllyKRZ2_IuR9Cl5bTTFDOSuAFJKrcUDb4GAM6vQzNwoS1pqBHs3quR2l6FKhHs_rVrF6l6IftgKFe4GwX_KcyARcb4KVpcf3fjfX06n6sUj7f5JvY42qXN-G3LhRXUj9-udbfnr5f_vzFqX7ifwF6hJT7</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Mehta, Jignasa</creator><creator>Farnell, Damian JJ</creator><creator>Stappler, Theodore</creator><creator>Liazos, Efstathios</creator><creator>Wong, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery</title><author>Mehta, Jignasa ; Farnell, Damian JJ ; Stappler, Theodore ; Liazos, Efstathios ; Wong, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3795-94fb785034070747ff27e095a0c0719a1c9cbbf6326e0d41dcf4b2aee8f780ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>age-related macular degeneration</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>counter-rotation surgery</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macula Lutea - surgery</topic><topic>Macular degeneration</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - surgery</topic><topic>Oculomotor Muscles - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Retina - surgery</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>tilt</topic><topic>Tilt-Table Test - methods</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Vision, Monocular</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Jignasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnell, Damian JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stappler, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liazos, Efstathios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehta, Jignasa</au><au>Farnell, Damian JJ</au><au>Stappler, Theodore</au><au>Liazos, Efstathios</au><au>Wong, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery</atitle><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>284-291</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background: Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors that influence the perception of tilt in the presence of residual cyclorotation following CRS.
Methods: Thirty‐four AMD patients treated with MTS and CRS were investigated; and all measurements were made preoperatively, and after each surgical procedure. Fundus photographs were analysed with computer software to determine the degree of retinal rotation and reliability was assessed by two independent assessors. The degree of perceptual rotation was measured with Maddox rod and the subjective appreciation of tilt was established by direct questioning. Fixation preference was determined by cover test and convergence. Bagolini glasses were used to determine binocular outcome.
Results: Post CRS, 20 of the 34 patients had adapted to tilt. There was a significant difference of 5° ± 7° (95% confidence intervals: 1–8°, t = 2.9, degree of freedom = 19, P = 0.008) between the degree of rotation measured from the fundus photographs and the Maddox rod measurement following CRS. Patients with residual retinal rotation less than or equal to 15° did not appreciate tilt in free space. More importantly, fixation with the operated eye and ignoring the image from the non‐operated eye was significantly associated with being free of tilt in natural viewing conditions (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the presence of residual cyclorotation of the macula following CRS of up to 27°, a significant proportion (59%) of patients did not perceive the world as tilted in natural viewing conditions. Differences between retinal rotation and perceptual tilt provide evidence of sensory adaptation. It was patients who fixed with their operated eye and ignored the image from the non‐operated eye who did not perceive tilt post CRS.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>20447125</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02235.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1442-6404 |
| ispartof | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2010-04, Vol.38 (3), p.284-291 |
| issn | 1442-6404 1442-9071 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733955354 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | adaptation age-related macular degeneration Binocular vision counter-rotation surgery Eye Fixation, Ocular - physiology Humans Macula Lutea - surgery Macular degeneration Macular Degeneration - surgery Oculomotor Muscles - surgery Patients Perception Regression Analysis Retina Retina - surgery Rotation Surgery tilt Tilt-Table Test - methods Vision, Binocular - physiology Vision, Monocular Visual Acuity Visual Perception - physiology |
| title | Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20tilt%20following%20counter-rotation%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Mehta,%20Jignasa&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=284-291&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02235.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733955354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413280360&rft_id=info:pmid/20447125&rfr_iscdi=true |