Perception of tilt following counter-rotation surgery

Background:  Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2010-04, Vol.38 (3), p.284-291
Hauptverfasser: Mehta, Jignasa, Farnell, Damian JJ, Stappler, Theodore, Liazos, Efstathios, Wong, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:  Macular translocation surgery (MTS) is one of the treatment options for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) followed by counter‐rotation surgery (CRS) to correct the resulting tilt. The objective of this paper is to determine the perception of tilt following CRS and identify factors that influence the perception of tilt in the presence of residual cyclorotation following CRS. Methods:  Thirty‐four AMD patients treated with MTS and CRS were investigated; and all measurements were made preoperatively, and after each surgical procedure. Fundus photographs were analysed with computer software to determine the degree of retinal rotation and reliability was assessed by two independent assessors. The degree of perceptual rotation was measured with Maddox rod and the subjective appreciation of tilt was established by direct questioning. Fixation preference was determined by cover test and convergence. Bagolini glasses were used to determine binocular outcome. Results:  Post CRS, 20 of the 34 patients had adapted to tilt. There was a significant difference of 5° ± 7° (95% confidence intervals: 1–8°, t = 2.9, degree of freedom = 19, P = 0.008) between the degree of rotation measured from the fundus photographs and the Maddox rod measurement following CRS. Patients with residual retinal rotation less than or equal to 15° did not appreciate tilt in free space. More importantly, fixation with the operated eye and ignoring the image from the non‐operated eye was significantly associated with being free of tilt in natural viewing conditions (P 
ISSN:1442-6404
1442-9071
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02235.x