Intracranial Radiosurgery in the Netherlands. A Planning Comparison of Available Systems with Regard to Physical Aspects and Workload

Different planning and treatment systems for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery available in the Netherlands are compared. The systems for intracranial radiosurgery include: Gamma Knife, Cyberknife, Novalis, and Tomotherapy. Electronic data of 5 patients was transferred to all participating cent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technology in cancer research & treatment 2010-06, Vol.9 (3), p.279-289
Hauptverfasser: Schoonbeek, A., Monshouwer, R., Hanssens, P., Raaijmakers, E., Nowak, P., Marijnissen, J. P. A., Lagerwaard, F. J., Cuijpers, J. P., Vonk, E. J. A., van der Maazen, R. W. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Different planning and treatment systems for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery available in the Netherlands are compared. The systems for intracranial radiosurgery include: Gamma Knife, Cyberknife, Novalis, and Tomotherapy. Electronic data of 5 patients was transferred to all participating centres and treatment plans were generated according to 2 different prescription protocols. For this study, plans were also generated for a conventional linac. Even systems with a high resolution (Gammaknife and Novalis) have conformity indices in violation with RTOG guidelines (CI > 2.5) when target volumes of 1 cc), all systems perform well. The workload of the different techniques was comparable although the treatment times were usually longer for Gamma Knife radiosurgery. We conclude that small targets should be treated by dedicated systems, larger volumes (>0.5–1 cc) can also be treated using conventional treatment systems equipped with a MLC.
ISSN:1533-0346
1533-0338
DOI:10.1177/153303461000900307