Use of a capillary tube for collecting an extraction solvent lighter than water after dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and its application in the determination of parabens in different samples by gas chromatography—Flame ionization detection
In this study a new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method is presented on the basis of a safe organic solvent, octanol, which is lighter than water. The proposed method is used for the extraction and pre-concentration of some preservatives including methyl paraben (Mep), ethyl para...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Talanta (Oxford) 2010-06, Vol.81 (4), p.1360-1367 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study a new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method is presented on the basis of a safe organic solvent, octanol, which is lighter than water. The proposed method is used for the extraction and pre-concentration of some preservatives including methyl paraben (Mep), ethyl paraben (Etp) and propyl paraben (Prp) from different matrices. The extracted compounds are monitored by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). A mixture of suitable extraction and dispersive solvents including 20
μL octanol and 0.5
mL acetone is quickly injected into the aqueous sample. The mixture is centrifuged for 10
min at 6000
rpm, so a small drop of extraction solvent collects on the water surface. A portion of the collected solvent is removed by a capillary tube through simple dipping the tube into organic solvent drop. 0.4
μL of extract into the tube is removed by a microsyringe and injected into GC. Some effective parameters such as kinds and volumes of extraction and dispersive solvents as well as extraction time have to be investigated. Under optimum conditions, enrichment factors and recoveries of the studied compounds were obtained in the range of 100–276 and 25–72%, respectively. Linear ranges of the calibration curves were between 0.05 and 30 for methyl- and 0.02 and 30
μg
mL
−1 for ethyl- and propyl parabens, respectively. Limit of detection for methyl paraben was 0.015
μg
mL
−1 and those of ethyl- and propyl parabens were 0.005
μg
mL
−1. Relative standard deviations (RSDs %) for six repeated measurements (
C
=
2
μg
mL
−1) were 2% for methyl-, and ethyl parabens and 3% for propyl parabens, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-9140 1873-3573 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.035 |