Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters
OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory. MATERIALS AND METHODS:T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Investigative radiology 2009-12, Vol.44 (12), p.769-775 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 775 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 769 |
container_title | Investigative radiology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Lemke, Andreas Laun, Frederik B Klau, Miriam Re, Thomas J Simon, Dirk Delorme, Stefan Schad, Lothar R Stieltjes, Bram |
description | OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-three patients with pancreas carcinoma and 14 volunteers with healthy pancreas were examined at 1.5 Tesla using a single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI pulse sequence. Eleven b-values ranging from 0 to 800 s/mm were used. The acquisition was separated into blocks (b0, b25), (b0, b50),...(b0, b800) and each block was acquired in a single expirational breath-hold (TA = 26 seconds) to avoid motion artifacts. The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADCtot. By applying the IVIM model, which allows for the estimation of perfusion effects in DWI, the perfusion fraction f and the perfusion free diffusion parameter D were calculated. The diagnostic performance of ADC, f and D as a measure for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
RESULTS:In the healthy control group, the ADCtot ranged from 1.53 to 2.01 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.71 ± 0.19 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 18.5% to 40.4% with a mean value of 25.0 ± 6.2%, and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.94 to 1.28 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.13 ± 0.15 μm/ms. In patients with pancreas carcinoma, the ADCtot ranged from 0.98 to 1.81 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.31 ± 0.24 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 0% to 20.4% with a mean value of 8.59 ± 4.6% and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.74 to 1.60 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.15 ± 0.22 μm/ms. In comparison to healthy pancreatic tissue, a significant reduction of the perfusion fraction f and of ADCtot was found in pancreatic carcinoma (P < 0.00001, 0.0002, respectively). The f value showed more than a 10-fold higher significance level in distinguishing cancerous from normal tissue when compared with the ADCtot value. No significant difference in the diffusion coefficient D was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.5). In the receiver operating characteristic-analyses, the area under curve for f was 0.991 and significantly larger than ADCtot (P < 0.05). f had the highest sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value with 95.7%, 100%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:Using |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b62271 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733881323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733881323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3041-5e8cdf6afa1ed7088f3629f83cd7aedd7a1cf4a1a98732ae0ec853cd130724d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRCILoU_QMg3TimeeDdxuFVpS1faCoRartGsM2YNThzspKU_x7fh7C5C4sDF9njevPdGj7HXIM5AVOW7z5v1mdgKkCRBwbbI8xKesAWsZJGJHMRTthAiF1lVVcUJexHjN5HqUsjn7AQqJRXksGC_LqwxFKgfLY7W99wb_gl7HQgjrzFo2_sO-VXwHb8mdOPu8U9_tJrf2hgn4nfR9l_5zeRGOzji2-wLuonie177bsBg44H4fEhFkuKz6BRnudqTMVbb-Rf7lq_7MeC9_0kuPbXf7a3xG7_3dkHB3lObDATsaKQQX7JnBl2kV8f7lN1dXd7W19nm44d1fb7JtBRLyFakdGsKNAjUlkIpI4u8MkrqtkRq0wHaLBGwUqXMkQRptUpNkKLMl62Sp-ztgXcI_kfabGw6GzU5hz35KTallEqBzGVCLg9IHXyMgUwzBNtheGxANHNwTQqu-Te4NPbmKDBtO2r_Dh2TSgB1ADx4N2_-3U0PFJrdPpP_c_8G2Yarrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733881323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lemke, Andreas ; Laun, Frederik B ; Klau, Miriam ; Re, Thomas J ; Simon, Dirk ; Delorme, Stefan ; Schad, Lothar R ; Stieltjes, Bram</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemke, Andreas ; Laun, Frederik B ; Klau, Miriam ; Re, Thomas J ; Simon, Dirk ; Delorme, Stefan ; Schad, Lothar R ; Stieltjes, Bram</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-three patients with pancreas carcinoma and 14 volunteers with healthy pancreas were examined at 1.5 Tesla using a single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI pulse sequence. Eleven b-values ranging from 0 to 800 s/mm were used. The acquisition was separated into blocks (b0, b25), (b0, b50),...(b0, b800) and each block was acquired in a single expirational breath-hold (TA = 26 seconds) to avoid motion artifacts. The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADCtot. By applying the IVIM model, which allows for the estimation of perfusion effects in DWI, the perfusion fraction f and the perfusion free diffusion parameter D were calculated. The diagnostic performance of ADC, f and D as a measure for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
RESULTS:In the healthy control group, the ADCtot ranged from 1.53 to 2.01 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.71 ± 0.19 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 18.5% to 40.4% with a mean value of 25.0 ± 6.2%, and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.94 to 1.28 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.13 ± 0.15 μm/ms. In patients with pancreas carcinoma, the ADCtot ranged from 0.98 to 1.81 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.31 ± 0.24 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 0% to 20.4% with a mean value of 8.59 ± 4.6% and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.74 to 1.60 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.15 ± 0.22 μm/ms. In comparison to healthy pancreatic tissue, a significant reduction of the perfusion fraction f and of ADCtot was found in pancreatic carcinoma (P < 0.00001, 0.0002, respectively). The f value showed more than a 10-fold higher significance level in distinguishing cancerous from normal tissue when compared with the ADCtot value. No significant difference in the diffusion coefficient D was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.5). In the receiver operating characteristic-analyses, the area under curve for f was 0.991 and significantly larger than ADCtot (P < 0.05). f had the highest sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value with 95.7%, 100%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:Using the IVIM-approach, the f value proved to be the best parameter for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic cancer. The acquisition of several b-values strongly improved the stability of the parameter estimation thus increasing the sensitivity and specificity to 95.7% and 100% respectively. The proposed method may hold great promise for the non invasive, noncontrast-enhanced imaging of pancreas lesions and may eventually become a screening tool for pancreatic cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-9996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b62271</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19838121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motion ; Pancreas - pathology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Investigative radiology, 2009-12, Vol.44 (12), p.769-775</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3041-5e8cdf6afa1ed7088f3629f83cd7aedd7a1cf4a1a98732ae0ec853cd130724d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laun, Frederik B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klau, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delorme, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Lothar R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieltjes, Bram</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters</title><title>Investigative radiology</title><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-three patients with pancreas carcinoma and 14 volunteers with healthy pancreas were examined at 1.5 Tesla using a single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI pulse sequence. Eleven b-values ranging from 0 to 800 s/mm were used. The acquisition was separated into blocks (b0, b25), (b0, b50),...(b0, b800) and each block was acquired in a single expirational breath-hold (TA = 26 seconds) to avoid motion artifacts. The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADCtot. By applying the IVIM model, which allows for the estimation of perfusion effects in DWI, the perfusion fraction f and the perfusion free diffusion parameter D were calculated. The diagnostic performance of ADC, f and D as a measure for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
RESULTS:In the healthy control group, the ADCtot ranged from 1.53 to 2.01 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.71 ± 0.19 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 18.5% to 40.4% with a mean value of 25.0 ± 6.2%, and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.94 to 1.28 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.13 ± 0.15 μm/ms. In patients with pancreas carcinoma, the ADCtot ranged from 0.98 to 1.81 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.31 ± 0.24 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 0% to 20.4% with a mean value of 8.59 ± 4.6% and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.74 to 1.60 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.15 ± 0.22 μm/ms. In comparison to healthy pancreatic tissue, a significant reduction of the perfusion fraction f and of ADCtot was found in pancreatic carcinoma (P < 0.00001, 0.0002, respectively). The f value showed more than a 10-fold higher significance level in distinguishing cancerous from normal tissue when compared with the ADCtot value. No significant difference in the diffusion coefficient D was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.5). In the receiver operating characteristic-analyses, the area under curve for f was 0.991 and significantly larger than ADCtot (P < 0.05). f had the highest sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value with 95.7%, 100%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:Using the IVIM-approach, the f value proved to be the best parameter for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic cancer. The acquisition of several b-values strongly improved the stability of the parameter estimation thus increasing the sensitivity and specificity to 95.7% and 100% respectively. The proposed method may hold great promise for the non invasive, noncontrast-enhanced imaging of pancreas lesions and may eventually become a screening tool for pancreatic cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0020-9996</issn><issn>1536-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRCILoU_QMg3TimeeDdxuFVpS1faCoRartGsM2YNThzspKU_x7fh7C5C4sDF9njevPdGj7HXIM5AVOW7z5v1mdgKkCRBwbbI8xKesAWsZJGJHMRTthAiF1lVVcUJexHjN5HqUsjn7AQqJRXksGC_LqwxFKgfLY7W99wb_gl7HQgjrzFo2_sO-VXwHb8mdOPu8U9_tJrf2hgn4nfR9l_5zeRGOzji2-wLuonie177bsBg44H4fEhFkuKz6BRnudqTMVbb-Rf7lq_7MeC9_0kuPbXf7a3xG7_3dkHB3lObDATsaKQQX7JnBl2kV8f7lN1dXd7W19nm44d1fb7JtBRLyFakdGsKNAjUlkIpI4u8MkrqtkRq0wHaLBGwUqXMkQRptUpNkKLMl62Sp-ztgXcI_kfabGw6GzU5hz35KTallEqBzGVCLg9IHXyMgUwzBNtheGxANHNwTQqu-Te4NPbmKDBtO2r_Dh2TSgB1ADx4N2_-3U0PFJrdPpP_c_8G2Yarrw</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Lemke, Andreas</creator><creator>Laun, Frederik B</creator><creator>Klau, Miriam</creator><creator>Re, Thomas J</creator><creator>Simon, Dirk</creator><creator>Delorme, Stefan</creator><creator>Schad, Lothar R</creator><creator>Stieltjes, Bram</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters</title><author>Lemke, Andreas ; Laun, Frederik B ; Klau, Miriam ; Re, Thomas J ; Simon, Dirk ; Delorme, Stefan ; Schad, Lothar R ; Stieltjes, Bram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3041-5e8cdf6afa1ed7088f3629f83cd7aedd7a1cf4a1a98732ae0ec853cd130724d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laun, Frederik B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klau, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delorme, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Lothar R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieltjes, Bram</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemke, Andreas</au><au>Laun, Frederik B</au><au>Klau, Miriam</au><au>Re, Thomas J</au><au>Simon, Dirk</au><au>Delorme, Stefan</au><au>Schad, Lothar R</au><au>Stieltjes, Bram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters</atitle><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>769</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>769-775</pages><issn>0020-9996</issn><eissn>1536-0210</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in detail the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreas using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and parameters derived from the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-three patients with pancreas carcinoma and 14 volunteers with healthy pancreas were examined at 1.5 Tesla using a single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI pulse sequence. Eleven b-values ranging from 0 to 800 s/mm were used. The acquisition was separated into blocks (b0, b25), (b0, b50),...(b0, b800) and each block was acquired in a single expirational breath-hold (TA = 26 seconds) to avoid motion artifacts. The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADCtot. By applying the IVIM model, which allows for the estimation of perfusion effects in DWI, the perfusion fraction f and the perfusion free diffusion parameter D were calculated. The diagnostic performance of ADC, f and D as a measure for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
RESULTS:In the healthy control group, the ADCtot ranged from 1.53 to 2.01 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.71 ± 0.19 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 18.5% to 40.4% with a mean value of 25.0 ± 6.2%, and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.94 to 1.28 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.13 ± 0.15 μm/ms. In patients with pancreas carcinoma, the ADCtot ranged from 0.98 to 1.81 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.31 ± 0.24 μm/ms, the perfusion fraction f ranged from 0% to 20.4% with a mean value of 8.59 ± 4.6% and the diffusion coefficient D from 0.74 to 1.60 μm/ms with a mean value of 1.15 ± 0.22 μm/ms. In comparison to healthy pancreatic tissue, a significant reduction of the perfusion fraction f and of ADCtot was found in pancreatic carcinoma (P < 0.00001, 0.0002, respectively). The f value showed more than a 10-fold higher significance level in distinguishing cancerous from normal tissue when compared with the ADCtot value. No significant difference in the diffusion coefficient D was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.5). In the receiver operating characteristic-analyses, the area under curve for f was 0.991 and significantly larger than ADCtot (P < 0.05). f had the highest sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value with 95.7%, 100%, 93.3%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:Using the IVIM-approach, the f value proved to be the best parameter for the differentiation between healthy pancreas and pancreatic cancer. The acquisition of several b-values strongly improved the stability of the parameter estimation thus increasing the sensitivity and specificity to 95.7% and 100% respectively. The proposed method may hold great promise for the non invasive, noncontrast-enhanced imaging of pancreas lesions and may eventually become a screening tool for pancreatic cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19838121</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b62271</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-9996 |
ispartof | Investigative radiology, 2009-12, Vol.44 (12), p.769-775 |
issn | 0020-9996 1536-0210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733881323 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Diagnosis, Differential Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Male Middle Aged Motion Pancreas - pathology Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult |
title | Differentiation of Pancreas Carcinoma From Healthy Pancreatic Tissue Using Multiple b-Values: Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Parameters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation%20of%20Pancreas%20Carcinoma%20From%20Healthy%20Pancreatic%20Tissue%20Using%20Multiple%20b-Values:%20Comparison%20of%20Apparent%20Diffusion%20Coefficient%20and%20Intravoxel%20Incoherent%20Motion%20Derived%20Parameters&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20radiology&rft.au=Lemke,%20Andreas&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=769-775&rft.issn=0020-9996&rft.eissn=1536-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b62271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733881323%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733881323&rft_id=info:pmid/19838121&rfr_iscdi=true |