Can Psychiatrists and Neurologists Predict Their Patientsʼ Participation Preferences?

There is evidence that an optimal match of patientsʼ participation preferences improves health outcomes. Since it is unknown whether psychiatrists and neurologists can predict their patientsʼ participation preferences we performed a cross-sectional survey involving N = 101 inpatients with schizophre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of nervous and mental disease 2010-04, Vol.198 (4), p.309-311
Hauptverfasser: Hamann, Johannes, Mendel, Rosmarie, Schebitz, Matthias, Reiter, Sarah, Bühner, Markus, Cohen, Rudolf, Berthele, Achim, Kissling, Werner
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There is evidence that an optimal match of patientsʼ participation preferences improves health outcomes. Since it is unknown whether psychiatrists and neurologists can predict their patientsʼ participation preferences we performed a cross-sectional survey involving N = 101 inpatients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and N = 102 inpatients with multiple sclerosis. Both patients and their physicians in charge were surveyed with respect to the patientsʼ participation preferences, using the Autonomy Preference Index and a global estimate. Most patients wished to participate in medical decision making. Doctors performed poorly when predicting their individual patientsʼ participation preferences and tended to overestimate their patientsʼ participation preferences. A longer duration of the hospital stay did not improve the accuracy of doctorsʼ estimates. Thus, neurologists and psychiatrists fail at predicting their patientsʼ participation preferences accurately, which might challenge patientsʼ treatment satisfaction. More attention in the consultation should be paid to patientsʼ preferences.
ISSN:0022-3018
1539-736X
DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d6128c