BCR-ABL-independent and RAS / MAPK pathway-dependent form of imatinib resistance in Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line with activation of EphB4
Objective: We investigated the mechanism responsible for imatinib (IM) resistance in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) cell lines. Methods: We established cell lines from a patient with Ph+ ALL at the time of first diagnosis and relapsed phase and designated as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of haematology 2010-03, Vol.84 (3), p.229-238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: We investigated the mechanism responsible for imatinib (IM) resistance in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) cell lines. Methods: We established cell lines from a patient with Ph+ ALL at the time of first diagnosis and relapsed phase and designated as NPhA1 and NPhA2, respectively. We also derived IM‐resistant cells, NPhA2/STIR, from NPhA2 under gradually increasing IM concentrations. Results: NPhA1 was sensitive to IM (IC50 0.05 μm) and NPhA2 showed mild IM resistance (IC50 0.3 μm). NPhA2/STIR could be maintained in the presence of 10 μm IM. Phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was slightly elevated in NPhA2 and significantly elevated in NPhA2/STIR compared to NPhA1 cells. After treatment with IM, phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was not suppressed but rather increased in NPhA2 and NPhA2/STIR. Active RAS was also increased markedly in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. The expression of BCL‐2 was increased in NPhA2 compared to NPhA1, but no further increase in NPhA2/STIR. Proliferation of NPhA2/STIR was significantly inhibited by a combination of MEK inhibitor and IM. Analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation status with a protein tyrosine kinase array showed increased phosphorylation of EphB4 in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. Although transcription of EphB4 was suppressed in NPhA1 and NPhA2 after IM treatment, it was not suppressed and its ligand, ephrinB2, was increased in NPhA2/STIR. Suppression of EphB4 transcripts by introducing short hairpin RNA into NPhA2/STIR partially restored their sensitivity to IM. Conclusions: These results suggest a new mechanism of IM resistance mediated by the activation of RAS/MAPK pathway and EphB4. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0902-4441 1600-0609 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01387.x |