Posterior decompression and stabilization for multiple metastatic tumors of the spine
Although the value of surgical decompression and stabilization for solitary spinal metastasis is well documented, indication for surgery for advanced multiple metastatic tumors of the spine is controversial. In this study, the clinical effect of posterior decompression and stabilization was investig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1992-11, Vol.17 (11), p.1400-1404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although the value of surgical decompression and stabilization for solitary spinal metastasis is well documented, indication for surgery for advanced multiple metastatic tumors of the spine is controversial. In this study, the clinical effect of posterior decompression and stabilization was investigated in 11 patients with advanced multiple spinal metastases with unfavorable conditions. Mean blood loss during surgery was 3000 g. Disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in three patients. Neurologic improvement was observed in nine patients. There was no neurologic deterioration due to surgery in any patients. A measure of pain relief was obtained in all patients. However, the postoperative longevity was short and the patients died 2.5 months (on average) after operation, except in cases of breast cancer. The effect of the posterior surgery on multiple spinal metastases depended on primary diseases. In cases of short life expectancy, the effect of the surgery was limited only to the short duration of neurologic improvement, pain relief, and ease of nursing care while confronted with grave surgical morbidity. In cases of long life expectancy with tumors like breast cancer, however, posterior decompression and stabilization were expected to exert long-term therapeutic effect. Therefore, the posterior surgery for multiple spinal metastases is cautiously indicated considering the nature of the primary tumor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00007632-199211000-00022 |