Reflecting on a program of participatory ergonomics interventions: A multiple case study
Evaluations of participative ergonomics (PE) interventions have reported mixed results, potentially due to both program and theory deficits. In a multiple case study of four worksites in different companies using a quasi-experimental approach, we examined process, implementation, and effects. The pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2009-01, Vol.34 (2), p.161-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evaluations of participative ergonomics (PE) interventions have
reported mixed results, potentially due to both program and theory deficits. In
a multiple case study of four worksites in different companies using a
quasi-experimental approach, we examined process, implementation, and effects.
The process evaluation was based upon fieldwork and interviews with
approximately 90 persons. Implemented changes were documented by PE teams and
intensity judged by the research team. The effect evaluation was performed
using questionnaire-based measures (physical effort, influence, pain and
potential confounders) among cohorts present both before and after the changes
(N=258).
Ergonomic change teams (ECTs) faced challenges
securing employees' time, varying management commitment and significant
production pressures. Nevertheless they actively introduced between 10 and 21
changes over 10–20 months of activity. Limited intensity of exposure reduction
was observed, resulting in no discernible effects on physical effort or pain
among the employees. Potential reasons that may account for limited effects and
lessons for workplace parties, practitioners, and intervention researchers are
discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-9815 1875-9270 |
DOI: | 10.3233/WOR-2009-0914 |