Assessing professionalism in surgeons

Abstract Professionalism has been identified as one of four domains of competency for surgical trainees in the UK. This implies that professionalism can be learned and assessed. The priorities of different professions and healthcare systems influence the value placed on different components of profe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2010-02, Vol.8 (1), p.20-27
1. Verfasser: Dreyer, J.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Professionalism has been identified as one of four domains of competency for surgical trainees in the UK. This implies that professionalism can be learned and assessed. The priorities of different professions and healthcare systems influence the value placed on different components of professionalism and UK surgeons need to identify the characteristics they would most value as part of an effective assessment process. The success of developing a taxonomy of non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) can guide a similar process for a taxonomy for professionalism assessment. A multitude of assessment instruments for professionalism have been described in the literature but very few are valid, reliable or practical. For surgical trainees a number of assessment tools should be considered. A quantifiable tool using multi-source feedback could be the most practical for clinical surgeons to use. It is important, however, that it is not used to assess isolated behaviours but assess conduct within a surgical community of practice, and that the thinking process behind (un)professional behaviour is also understood, especially in stressful situations.
ISSN:1479-666X
2405-5840
DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2009.10.008