A prospective trial comparing lymphangiogram, cross-sectional imaging, and positron emission tomography scan in the detection of lymph node metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer

This study prospectively evaluated the use of lymphangiogram, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of lymph node metastasis in patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. Twenty patients underwent lymphangiogram, comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical oncology 2010-02, Vol.33 (1), p.89-93
Hauptverfasser: Small, Jr, William, Vern, Tamara Z, Rademaker, Alfred, Nemcek, Albert, Spies, Stewart, Schink, Julian C, Singh, Diljeet K, Lurain, John R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study prospectively evaluated the use of lymphangiogram, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of lymph node metastasis in patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. Twenty patients underwent lymphangiogram, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and PET. There was no histologic verification of metastasis. Four lymph node regions, including the internal, external, and common iliacs, and para-aortic, were scored as positive or negative for metastasis. Agreement between imaging was analyzed using multirater kappa and disease-free survival utilizing Kaplan Meier survival curves and log-rank test. Agreement between imaging was most consistent in the common iliacs (P < 0.001) and least in the para-aortic region (P = 0.41). Disease-free survival (DFS) at one year was statistically associated with positive PET imaging (25%) versus negative PET imaging (86%) (P = 0.033) in the common iliac lymph node region. No other single lymph node region in any modality was statistically associated with DFS. One-year DFS in patients with any positive areas on PET imaging was 50% compared with 90% in patients with negative PET imaging (P = 0.02). Seven patients were noted to have no metastasis in any region by all 3 of the imaging modalities; the 1-year DFS in these 7 patients was 100% compared with 59% in the 13 patients with any positive nodal area (P = 0.05). Positive lymphadenopathy on PET imaging was associated with reduced DFS.
ISSN:0277-3732
1537-453X
DOI:10.1097/COC.0b013e31819fdfae