Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes

Objective The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative pain between transumbilical single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) and conventional 4-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design We retrospectively reviewed 157 patients who un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2010-07, Vol.203 (1), p.26.e1-26.e6
Hauptverfasser: Yim, Ga Won, MD, Jung, Yong Wook, MD, Paek, Jiheum, MD, Lee, San Hui, MD, Kwon, Ha Yan, MD, Nam, Eun Ji, MD, Kim, Sunghoon, MD, Kim, Jae Hoon, MD, Kim, Young Tae, MD, Kim, Sang Wun, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative pain between transumbilical single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) and conventional 4-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design We retrospectively reviewed 157 patients who underwent SPA-TLH (n = 52) or conventional TLH (n = 105). A single-port access system consisted of a wound retractor, surgical glove, 2 5 mm trocars, and 1 10/11 mm trocar. Results The SPA-TLH group had less intraoperative blood loss ( P < .001), shorter hospital stay ( P = .001), and earlier diet intake ( P < .001) compared with the conventional TLH group. There was no difference in perioperative complications. Immediate postoperative pain score was lower in the SPA-TLH group ( P < .001). Postoperative pain after 6 and 24 hours was lower in SPA-TLH with marginal statistical significance. Conclusion SPA-TLH is a feasible method for hysterectomy with lower immediate postoperative pain and better surgical outcomes with respect to recovery time compared with conventional TLH.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026