Carotid Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Detecting Carotid In-Stent Restenosis
BACKGROUND—Duplex ultrasonography criteria for assessing the severity of carotid artery (CA) in-stent restenosis are not well established. METHODS AND RESULTS—We analyzed 39 patients (40 CAs) who underwent CA stenting with baseline and 6-month follow-up carotid duplex ultrasonography and intravascul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2009-10, Vol.2 (5), p.438-443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND—Duplex ultrasonography criteria for assessing the severity of carotid artery (CA) in-stent restenosis are not well established.
METHODS AND RESULTS—We analyzed 39 patients (40 CAs) who underwent CA stenting with baseline and 6-month follow-up carotid duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound. Intravascular ultrasound measurements included minimum luminal diameter, percent diameter, and lumen area stenosis. Duplex ultrasonography measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV), percentage change in PSV, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal-to-common CA PSV ratio (ICA/CCA). Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed each duplex measurement to detect ≥50% diameter, ≥75% lumen area stenosis, and minimum luminal diameter 41 cm/s and ICA/CCA >2 had the highest sensitivity in detecting ≥75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis.
CONCLUSIONS—PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA PSV ratio were good discriminators for detecting significant diameter and lumen area greater compared with those for native CA. The combination of duplex velocity criteria increases diagnostic accuracy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-7640 1941-7632 |
DOI: | 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276 |