Valve-in-Valve Implantation Using a Novel Supravalvular Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Proof of Concept

Background Transcatheter valve implantation within degenerated bioprostheses is a potentially promising treatment for high-risk surgical patients. Clinical experience is limited; however, we have shown in vitro that currently available transcatheter aortic valve sizes did not provide acceptable hemo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2009-12, Vol.88 (6), p.1864-1869
Hauptverfasser: Azadani, Ali N., PhD, Jaussaud, Nicolas, MD, Matthews, Peter B., BS, Ge, Liang, PhD, Guy, T. Sloane, MD, Chuter, Timothy A.M., MD, Tseng, Elaine E., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Transcatheter valve implantation within degenerated bioprostheses is a potentially promising treatment for high-risk surgical patients. Clinical experience is limited; however, we have shown in vitro that currently available transcatheter aortic valve sizes did not provide acceptable hemodynamics in small bioprostheses. The objective of this study was to develop a new transcatheter valve that would provide good hemodynamics within degenerated bioprostheses. Methods Supravalvular transcatheter valves were created using a Dacron covered stainless steel stent at the base and trileaflet pericardial leaflets in an open stent above the bioprosthesis. The transcatheter valves were implanted within 19-, 21-, and 23-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses with simulated degeneration using BioGlue to achieve a mean pressure gradient of 50 mm Hg. Hemodynamics of valve-in-valve implantation were studied in a pulse duplicator. Results Supravalvular transcatheter valves successfully relieved bioprosthetic stenosis. Acceptable hemodynamics were achieved with a significant reduction in mean pressure gradient of 54.0 ± 3.5 to 9.2 ± 6.3 mm Hg in 23-mm bioprostheses ( p < 0.001), from 49.3 ± 3.1 to 14.4 ± 4.7 mmHg ( p < 0.001) in 21 mm, and from 53.9 ± 3.8 to 28.3 ± 9.8 mm Hg ( p = 0.013) in 19-mm bioprostheses. Effective orifice area after valve-in-valve implantation increased significantly and was comparable to rereplacement with the same size bioprosthesis. Conclusions Valve-in-valve implantation was performed using a novel supravalvular transcatheter valve, which successfully relieved bioprosthetic stenosis. The hemodynamics were comparable with standard surgical valve replacement. Further studies are required to assess device safety and efficacy in patients.
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.004