Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease

Background The MCID is the smallest difference in an outcome score which a patient perceives as beneficial. The PASS is the score below which patients consider themselves well. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID and PASS for a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain in patients tre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2009-11, Vol.18 (6), p.927-932
Hauptverfasser: Tashjian, Robert Z., MD, Deloach, Julia, Porucznik, Christina A., MSPH, PhD, Powell, Amy P., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The MCID is the smallest difference in an outcome score which a patient perceives as beneficial. The PASS is the score below which patients consider themselves well. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID and PASS for a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. Material and methods 81 patients with rotator cuff disease were evaluated after 6 weeks of non-operative treatment with a VAS measuring pain and two transition questions utilized in determining the MCID and PASS. Results The MCID and PASS were estimated to be 1.4 cm ( P = .0255) and 3 cm (95% CI – 22.69, 37.31) on a 10 cm VAS measuring pain, respectively. Age ( P = .0492) and hand-dominance ( P = .0325) affected the MCID while age ( P = .0376) and duration of follow-up ( P = .0131) affected the PASS. Discussion The MCID and PASS estimates provide the basis to determine if statistically significant changes in VAS pain scores after treatment are clinically important and if the treatment allowed patients to achieve a satisfactory state. Level of evidence Level 3; Nonconsecutive series of patients, diagnostic study.
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021