3D versus 2D dynamic 82Rb myocardial blood flow imaging in a canine model of stunned and infarcted myocardium

PURPOSEPrevious studies have shown the ability of rubidium-82 (Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to quantitatively measure myocardial blood flow (MBF), many of which are performed using two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging provides increased sensitivity and may r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine communications 2010-01, Vol.31 (1), p.75-81
Hauptverfasser: Lekx, Katie S, deKemp, Robert A, Beanlands, Rob S.B, Wisenberg, Gerald, Wells, Glenn, Stodilka, Robert Z, Lortie, Mireille, Klein, Ran, Zabel, Pamela, Kovacs, Michael S, Sykes, Jane, Prato, Frank S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSEPrevious studies have shown the ability of rubidium-82 (Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to quantitatively measure myocardial blood flow (MBF), many of which are performed using two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging provides increased sensitivity and may result in decreased costs owing to a reduction in the required injected activity of radiotracer. This study compares 2D and 3D Rb PET MBF results obtained in the same imaging session. METHODSThree-dimensional and 2D Rb perfusion imaging was performed in canines on a GE Discovery LS PET/CT scanner at rest and during hyperemia in stunned and infarcted tissue. MBF (ml/min/g) was determined using a 1-compartment model and an extraction correction of the uptake rate and analyzed using a standard 17-segment model. RESULTSA strong, significant correlation was present (ρ = 0.95, P
ISSN:0143-3636
1473-5628
DOI:10.1097/MNM.0b013e328332b359