3D versus 2D dynamic 82Rb myocardial blood flow imaging in a canine model of stunned and infarcted myocardium
PURPOSEPrevious studies have shown the ability of rubidium-82 (Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to quantitatively measure myocardial blood flow (MBF), many of which are performed using two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging provides increased sensitivity and may r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear medicine communications 2010-01, Vol.31 (1), p.75-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSEPrevious studies have shown the ability of rubidium-82 (Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to quantitatively measure myocardial blood flow (MBF), many of which are performed using two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging provides increased sensitivity and may result in decreased costs owing to a reduction in the required injected activity of radiotracer. This study compares 2D and 3D Rb PET MBF results obtained in the same imaging session.
METHODSThree-dimensional and 2D Rb perfusion imaging was performed in canines on a GE Discovery LS PET/CT scanner at rest and during hyperemia in stunned and infarcted tissue. MBF (ml/min/g) was determined using a 1-compartment model and an extraction correction of the uptake rate and analyzed using a standard 17-segment model.
RESULTSA strong, significant correlation was present (ρ = 0.95, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0143-3636 1473-5628 |
DOI: | 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328332b359 |