Influence of efflux transporters on liver, bile and brain disposition of amitriptyline in mice
The aim of this work was to clarify the role of Abcb1 and the possible involvement of Abcc2 and Abcg2 in liver, bile and brain disposition of amitriptyline (AMI). AMI was administrated to Abcb1a deficient mice ( n = 36): CF1 (−/−) and CF1 (+/+) mice received via intraperitoneal route (i.p.) 5 mg/kg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of pharmaceutics 2009-08, Vol.378 (1), p.80-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of this work was to clarify the role of Abcb1 and the possible involvement of Abcc2 and Abcg2 in liver, bile and brain disposition of amitriptyline (AMI).
AMI was administrated to Abcb1a deficient mice (
n
=
36): CF1 (−/−) and CF1 (+/+) mice received via intraperitoneal route (i.p.) 5
mg/kg AMI and CF1 (+/+) mice received i.p. 5
mg/kg AMI
+
100
mg/kg quinidine (Abcb1 inhibitor). Then, Swiss mice (
n
=
24) received i.p. 5
mg/kg AMI alone and in association with 200
mg/kg novobiocin (Abcg2 inhibitor), 20
mg/kg probenecid (Abcc2 inhibitor) and 100
mg/kg quinidine.
Plasma concentrations of AMI were not influenced by novobiocin, probenecid and the lack of Abcb1, but were significantly increased by quinidine, resulting from the inhibition of hydroxylation mediated by CYP2D6. Brain distribution of AMI was not influenced by the lack of Abcb1 but was slightly significant with quinidine and not with novobiocin and probenecid. At the hepato-biliary interface, we showed the involvement of Abcb1, Abcc2 and Abcg2; indeed, AMI concentration was increased in liver and decreased in bile, where quinidine is the strongest inhibitor, followed by probenecid and novobiocin.
These results show that in brain the effect of Abcb1, Abcc2 and Abcg2 should be negligible and that at the hepato-biliary level, Abcb1 plays a predominant role compared to Abcc2 and Abcg2. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-5173 1873-3476 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.068 |