Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus

Three portable blood lactate analysers, Lactate Pro (LP), Lactate Scout (LS) and Lactate Plus (L + ), were evaluated. Analyser reliability and accuracy was assessed. For reliability, intra- and inter-analyser comparisons demonstrated that the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L + (intra-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 2010-06, Vol.109 (3), p.551-559
Hauptverfasser: Tanner, Rebecca K., Fuller, Kate L., Ross, Megan L. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Three portable blood lactate analysers, Lactate Pro (LP), Lactate Scout (LS) and Lactate Plus (L + ), were evaluated. Analyser reliability and accuracy was assessed. For reliability, intra- and inter-analyser comparisons demonstrated that the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L + (intra-TE = 0.4, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater overall reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.0, inter-TE = 0.8 mM). At BLa  8.0 mM, the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L + (intra- and inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.1 mM, inter-TE = 0.9 mM). For accuracy, the L + (SEE = 0.6 mM) compared more favourably to the LP than the LS (SEE = 1.1 mM). At BLa ~1.0–18.0 mM, the LS produced values that were up to 0.9 mM higher than the LP; the L + produced BLa that were within ±0.1 mM. All portable analysers tended to under-read the ABL 700 analyser. The suitability of the LP and L + as accurate analysers is supported by strong correlations ( r  = 0.91 and r  = 0.94) and limits of agreement ≤2.1 mM. This study showed that the LP and L + , compared well to each other, displayed good reliability and accuracy when compared to a laboratory-based analyser. Although the LS also displayed relatively good reliability, it was not as reliable or accurate as the LP or L + .
ISSN:1439-6319
1439-6327
DOI:10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9