The Spineangel® : Examining the validity and reliability of a novel clinical device for monitoring trunk motion

Abstract Spinal loading in excessive and repeated trunk flexion may hinder recovery from acute low back pain. The Spineangel® device provides real-time patient biofeedback on trunk flexion and may facilitate recovery from lower back injury. This cross-sectional study evaluates validity and reliabili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Manual therapy 2010-04, Vol.15 (2), p.160-166
Hauptverfasser: Intolo, Pattariya, Carman, Allan B, Milosavljevic, Stephan, Abbott, J. Haxby, Baxter, G. David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Spinal loading in excessive and repeated trunk flexion may hinder recovery from acute low back pain. The Spineangel® device provides real-time patient biofeedback on trunk flexion and may facilitate recovery from lower back injury. This cross-sectional study evaluates validity and reliability of this device in the laboratory setting. Participants included 18 healthy males. Angular displacements were simultaneously obtained from a Spineangel® device placed on the hip and criterion measures of hip, lumbar and total sagittal rotation, and pelvic tilt obtained via 3D Motion Analysis® . Each participant repeated four movements five times in a random order (forward bending fingertips-to-knees and to mid-lower leg, full flexion, and full extension). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for Spineangel® measurement of trunk motion were excellent (ICC > 0.9). The coefficient of repeatability was less than 5.2° in both flexion and extension. Spineangel® showed the highest correlation with Motion Analysis® measurement of pelvic tilt with no statistical difference between measures when bending forward to fingertips-to-knees. Given its high reliability, the Spineangel® device has potential as a trunk flexion biofeedback device. Further investigation is required to see if these laboratory results can be reproduced in the clinical setting and to determine the clinical benefits of such a device.
ISSN:1356-689X
1532-2769
DOI:10.1016/j.math.2009.10.002