Pharmaceutical Advertising in the Journal
To the Editor: I found it ironic that Dr. Douglas Waud's impassioned Sounding Board article (July 30 issue),* which strongly opposed the acceptance by physicians of gifts from pharmaceutical companies, either direct or indirect (e.g., a subsidy for registration at a scientific meeting), appeare...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1992-12, Vol.327 (23), p.1688-1689 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
I found it ironic that Dr. Douglas Waud's impassioned Sounding Board article (July 30 issue),* which strongly opposed the acceptance by physicians of gifts from pharmaceutical companies, either direct or indirect (e.g., a subsidy for registration at a scientific meeting), appeared in a medical journal that carries substantial advertising from pharmaceutical companies. To the extent that such advertising revenue subsidizes the subscription rates for its readers, would Dr. Waud consider the
Journal
as a conduit for another "bribe" from the pharmaceutical industry to the medical profession? Does the editor of the
Journal
consider pharmaceutical advertising a bribe . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199212033272314 |