Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties
Background The pulmonary autograft remodels when subjected to systemic pressure and subsequent dilation can lead to reoperation. Inherent material property differences between pulmonary and aortic roots may influence remodeling but are currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of thoracic surgery 2010-06, Vol.89 (6), p.1981-1988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1988 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1981 |
container_title | The Annals of thoracic surgery |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Matthews, Peter B., BS Azadani, Ali N., PhD Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD Ge, Liang, PhD Guy, T. Sloane, MD Guccione, Julius M., PhD Tseng, Elaine E., MD |
description | Background The pulmonary autograft remodels when subjected to systemic pressure and subsequent dilation can lead to reoperation. Inherent material property differences between pulmonary and aortic roots may influence remodeling but are currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine stiffness across a wide range of strain and compare nonlinear material properties of corresponding regions of native aortic and pulmonary roots. Methods Tissue samples from porcine aortic and pulmonary roots—sinuses and supravalvular artery distal to the sinotubular junction—were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Stiffness from low to high strains at 0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 strain were determined for comparisons. Results Aortic and pulmonary roots exhibited qualitatively similar material properties; both had greater nonlinearity in the sinus than supravalvular artery. The pulmonary artery was significantly more compliant than the ascending aorta both circumferentially and longitudinally throughout the strain range ( p < 0.03), except at high strain circumferentially ( p = 0.06). However, no differences in stiffness were seen circumferentially or longitudinally between pulmonary and aortic sinuses ( p ≥ 0.3) until high strain, when the pulmonary sinuses were significantly stiffer ( p < 0.05) in both directions. Conclusions Differences in stiffness between porcine aortic and pulmonary roots are regionally specific, supravalvular artery versus sinus. These regional differences may impact the mode of remodeling to influence late autograft dilation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733344178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S000349751000490X</els_id><sourcerecordid>733344178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-faddca85fe52bce26dea5f566bb19e355feeef36ee8f6f01358a2a6b9fc342283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbav1D5xinbsR17kwsSrApFomIFVOrNcpyx6iWJFzupxL_H0dIiceppvt6Z0TxDCGWwZMDU1-3SjL9DNDZNcckhp0EsAfgHsmBS8kJxWR-QBQCIoqxX8ogcp7TNIc_lj-SIQ1mXoGBB1uvQ70z0KQw0OLoJ0foB6Wbq-jCY-EzN0NLzEEdv6V0II_1hRozedHQTww5zHtMncuhMl_Dzqz0hPy-_Pay_Fze3V9fr85vClrwaC2fa1ppKOpS8schVi0Y6qVTTsBqFzAVEJxRi5ZQDJmRluFFN7awoOa_ECTndz93F8DRhGnXvk8WuMwOGKemVEKIs2WpWVnuljSGliE7vou_zOZqBngnqrX4jqGeCGoTOfHLrl9clU9Nj-6_xL7IsuNgLMJ_6x2PUyXocLLY-oh11G_z_bDl7N8R2fvDWdI_4jGkbpjhklJrpxDXo-_mT8yNZdsoafokXM7uddA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733344178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Matthews, Peter B., BS ; Azadani, Ali N., PhD ; Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD ; Ge, Liang, PhD ; Guy, T. Sloane, MD ; Guccione, Julius M., PhD ; Tseng, Elaine E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Peter B., BS ; Azadani, Ali N., PhD ; Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD ; Ge, Liang, PhD ; Guy, T. Sloane, MD ; Guccione, Julius M., PhD ; Tseng, Elaine E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The pulmonary autograft remodels when subjected to systemic pressure and subsequent dilation can lead to reoperation. Inherent material property differences between pulmonary and aortic roots may influence remodeling but are currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine stiffness across a wide range of strain and compare nonlinear material properties of corresponding regions of native aortic and pulmonary roots. Methods Tissue samples from porcine aortic and pulmonary roots—sinuses and supravalvular artery distal to the sinotubular junction—were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Stiffness from low to high strains at 0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 strain were determined for comparisons. Results Aortic and pulmonary roots exhibited qualitatively similar material properties; both had greater nonlinearity in the sinus than supravalvular artery. The pulmonary artery was significantly more compliant than the ascending aorta both circumferentially and longitudinally throughout the strain range ( p < 0.03), except at high strain circumferentially ( p = 0.06). However, no differences in stiffness were seen circumferentially or longitudinally between pulmonary and aortic sinuses ( p ≥ 0.3) until high strain, when the pulmonary sinuses were significantly stiffer ( p < 0.05) in both directions. Conclusions Differences in stiffness between porcine aortic and pulmonary roots are regionally specific, supravalvular artery versus sinus. These regional differences may impact the mode of remodeling to influence late autograft dilation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20494060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aorta - transplantation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Humans ; Pulmonary Artery - transplantation ; Surgery ; Swine</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2010-06, Vol.89 (6), p.1981-1988</ispartof><rights>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-faddca85fe52bce26dea5f566bb19e355feeef36ee8f6f01358a2a6b9fc342283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-faddca85fe52bce26dea5f566bb19e355feeef36ee8f6f01358a2a6b9fc342283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20494060$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Peter B., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azadani, Ali N., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Liang, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, T. Sloane, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guccione, Julius M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Elaine E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background The pulmonary autograft remodels when subjected to systemic pressure and subsequent dilation can lead to reoperation. Inherent material property differences between pulmonary and aortic roots may influence remodeling but are currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine stiffness across a wide range of strain and compare nonlinear material properties of corresponding regions of native aortic and pulmonary roots. Methods Tissue samples from porcine aortic and pulmonary roots—sinuses and supravalvular artery distal to the sinotubular junction—were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Stiffness from low to high strains at 0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 strain were determined for comparisons. Results Aortic and pulmonary roots exhibited qualitatively similar material properties; both had greater nonlinearity in the sinus than supravalvular artery. The pulmonary artery was significantly more compliant than the ascending aorta both circumferentially and longitudinally throughout the strain range ( p < 0.03), except at high strain circumferentially ( p = 0.06). However, no differences in stiffness were seen circumferentially or longitudinally between pulmonary and aortic sinuses ( p ≥ 0.3) until high strain, when the pulmonary sinuses were significantly stiffer ( p < 0.05) in both directions. Conclusions Differences in stiffness between porcine aortic and pulmonary roots are regionally specific, supravalvular artery versus sinus. These regional differences may impact the mode of remodeling to influence late autograft dilation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aorta - transplantation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pulmonary Artery - transplantation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbav1D5xinbsR17kwsSrApFomIFVOrNcpyx6iWJFzupxL_H0dIiceppvt6Z0TxDCGWwZMDU1-3SjL9DNDZNcckhp0EsAfgHsmBS8kJxWR-QBQCIoqxX8ogcp7TNIc_lj-SIQ1mXoGBB1uvQ70z0KQw0OLoJ0foB6Wbq-jCY-EzN0NLzEEdv6V0II_1hRozedHQTww5zHtMncuhMl_Dzqz0hPy-_Pay_Fze3V9fr85vClrwaC2fa1ppKOpS8schVi0Y6qVTTsBqFzAVEJxRi5ZQDJmRluFFN7awoOa_ECTndz93F8DRhGnXvk8WuMwOGKemVEKIs2WpWVnuljSGliE7vou_zOZqBngnqrX4jqGeCGoTOfHLrl9clU9Nj-6_xL7IsuNgLMJ_6x2PUyXocLLY-oh11G_z_bDl7N8R2fvDWdI_4jGkbpjhklJrpxDXo-_mT8yNZdsoafokXM7uddA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Matthews, Peter B., BS</creator><creator>Azadani, Ali N., PhD</creator><creator>Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD</creator><creator>Ge, Liang, PhD</creator><creator>Guy, T. Sloane, MD</creator><creator>Guccione, Julius M., PhD</creator><creator>Tseng, Elaine E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties</title><author>Matthews, Peter B., BS ; Azadani, Ali N., PhD ; Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD ; Ge, Liang, PhD ; Guy, T. Sloane, MD ; Guccione, Julius M., PhD ; Tseng, Elaine E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-faddca85fe52bce26dea5f566bb19e355feeef36ee8f6f01358a2a6b9fc342283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aorta - transplantation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pulmonary Artery - transplantation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Peter B., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azadani, Ali N., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Liang, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, T. Sloane, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guccione, Julius M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Elaine E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, Peter B., BS</au><au>Azadani, Ali N., PhD</au><au>Jhun, Choon-Sik, PhD</au><au>Ge, Liang, PhD</au><au>Guy, T. Sloane, MD</au><au>Guccione, Julius M., PhD</au><au>Tseng, Elaine E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1981</spage><epage>1988</epage><pages>1981-1988</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background The pulmonary autograft remodels when subjected to systemic pressure and subsequent dilation can lead to reoperation. Inherent material property differences between pulmonary and aortic roots may influence remodeling but are currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine stiffness across a wide range of strain and compare nonlinear material properties of corresponding regions of native aortic and pulmonary roots. Methods Tissue samples from porcine aortic and pulmonary roots—sinuses and supravalvular artery distal to the sinotubular junction—were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Stiffness from low to high strains at 0.15, 0.3, and 0.5 strain were determined for comparisons. Results Aortic and pulmonary roots exhibited qualitatively similar material properties; both had greater nonlinearity in the sinus than supravalvular artery. The pulmonary artery was significantly more compliant than the ascending aorta both circumferentially and longitudinally throughout the strain range ( p < 0.03), except at high strain circumferentially ( p = 0.06). However, no differences in stiffness were seen circumferentially or longitudinally between pulmonary and aortic sinuses ( p ≥ 0.3) until high strain, when the pulmonary sinuses were significantly stiffer ( p < 0.05) in both directions. Conclusions Differences in stiffness between porcine aortic and pulmonary roots are regionally specific, supravalvular artery versus sinus. These regional differences may impact the mode of remodeling to influence late autograft dilation.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20494060</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4975 |
ispartof | The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2010-06, Vol.89 (6), p.1981-1988 |
issn | 0003-4975 1552-6259 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733344178 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Aorta - transplantation Biomechanical Phenomena Cardiothoracic Surgery Humans Pulmonary Artery - transplantation Surgery Swine |
title | Comparison of Porcine Pulmonary and Aortic Root Material Properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T00%3A03%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Porcine%20Pulmonary%20and%20Aortic%20Root%20Material%20Properties&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Matthews,%20Peter%20B.,%20BS&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1981&rft.epage=1988&rft.pages=1981-1988&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733344178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733344178&rft_id=info:pmid/20494060&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S000349751000490X&rfr_iscdi=true |