Patient Costs As a Barrier to Intensive Health Behavior Counseling

Background Although intensive health behavior counseling has been demonstrated to help patients lose weight and quit smoking, many payers offer limited coverage for such counseling. Purpose This mixed-methods case study examined how coverage affected utilization of an electronic linkage system (eLin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.344-348
Hauptverfasser: Krist, Alex H., MD, MPH, Woolf, Steven H., MD, MPH, Johnson, Robert E., PhD, Rothemich, Stephen F., MD, MS, Cunningham, Tina D., BS, Jones, Resa M., MPH, PhD, Wilson, Diane B., EdD, RD, Devers, Kelly J., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although intensive health behavior counseling has been demonstrated to help patients lose weight and quit smoking, many payers offer limited coverage for such counseling. Purpose This mixed-methods case study examined how coverage affected utilization of an electronic linkage system (eLinkS) to help adult patients obtain intensive health behavior counseling, provided through a collaboration of primary care practices and community programs. Methods Grant support enabled patients to obtain counseling at no cost, but funds were exhausted within 5 weeks as a result of an overwhelming response. To study the influence of cost as a barrier, referrals were resumed for an additional 3 weeks, but patients were required to pay for them. Use of eLinkS, level of clinician counseling and referrals, and patient interest in referrals were measured using electronic medical record data and patient and clinician interviews. Results When counseling was free, approximately one in five patients with an unhealthy behavior and an eLinkS prompt was referred for intensive counseling. However, when patient charges were instituted, referrals decreased by 97% (from 21.8% to 0.7%, p
ISSN:0749-3797
1873-2607
DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.010