Compulsory and non-compulsory immunizations: Contraindications perceived by medical practitioners

A total of 284 general practitioners (GPs), paediatricians and doctors of public vaccination centres (DPVC) were interviewed to investigate their willingness to immunize children with compulsory (diphtheria-tetanus, oral polio) and non-compulsory (measles, pertussis) vaccines in the presence of 19 d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 1992, Vol.10 (11), p.742-746
Hauptverfasser: Zotti, Carla, Silvaplana, Paola, Ditommaso, Savina, Russo, Roberto, Ruggenini, Angela Moiraghi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A total of 284 general practitioners (GPs), paediatricians and doctors of public vaccination centres (DPVC) were interviewed to investigate their willingness to immunize children with compulsory (diphtheria-tetanus, oral polio) and non-compulsory (measles, pertussis) vaccines in the presence of 19 different medical histories. We observed a reluctance to immunize in the case of false contraindications, a lack of information mainly about non-compulsory immunizations, and doubts about the real contraindications to polio, measles and pertussis vaccines. The frequency of correct answers to the question posed was significantly higher in the group with less than 20 years of experience, and the DPVCs proved better informed about immunization. However, the crucial role played by the GPs and paediatricians' advice can prejudice the correct use of active immunization.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/0264-410X(92)90508-H