Comparison of early and late surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation: is earlier better?

The optimal timing for surgical intervention in cases of lumbar disc herniation is debatable. This retrospective study sought to determine whether early surgical intervention resulted in greater improvement in clinical outcomes. A total of 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by microendo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2010-05, Vol.15 (3), p.294-298
Hauptverfasser: Akagi, Ryuichiro, Aoki, Yasuchika, Ikeda, Yoshikazu, Nakajima, Fumitake, Ohtori, Seiji, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Yamagata, Masatsune
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The optimal timing for surgical intervention in cases of lumbar disc herniation is debatable. This retrospective study sought to determine whether early surgical intervention resulted in greater improvement in clinical outcomes. A total of 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy were reviewed. Surgery was performed when leg pain persisted despite adequate conservative treatment. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of symptoms before surgery, the early group being symptomatic for ≤3 months and the late group for >3 months. Surgical time, blood loss, severity of back pain, leg pain and numbness (visual analogue scale, or VAS), and a patient-oriented evaluation score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, or JOABPEQ) before and after surgery were compared. The JOABPEQ is a new evaluation method for lumbar spinal disorders based on Roland-Morris disability questionnaires and Short Form 36. There were 23 patients in each group. No signifi cant differences were found between the groups in patients’ demographics (age, sex, type of herniation), surgical time, blood loss, or pre- and postoperative VAS (lower-back pain, leg pain, numbness). There were no signifi cant differences between the groups in the scores for the fi ve subscales — pain-related disorders, gait disturbance, lumbar spine dysfunction, social life disturbance, psychological disorders — of the preoperative JOABPEQ. Postoperative scores for psychological disorders improved signifi cantly (P < 0.05) in the late group (mean score 39.9) compared to the early group (mean score 22.1). Interestingly, no signifi cant difference of improvement in the scores other than psychological disorder was found between the two groups. Early surgical intervention did not result in greater improvement of clinical outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation. Later surgical intervention resulted in signifi cant improvement of psychological disorders.
ISSN:0949-2658
1436-2023
DOI:10.1007/s00776-010-1457-1