Prospective randomized comparison between the conventional electroanatomical system and three-dimensional rotational angiography during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background Theoretically, the use of electroanatomical mapping systems may reduce radiation exposure, while three-dimensional rotational atriography (3DATG) may increase exposure. Anatomical representation and image registration using 3DATG are likely to be superior, but the net clinical benefit of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2010-04, Vol.7 (4), p.459-465
Hauptverfasser: Knecht, Sébastien, MD, Wright, Matthew, MBBS, PhD, Akrivakis, Spyridon, MD, Nault, Isabelle, MD, Matsuo, Seiichiro, MD, Chaudhry, G. Muqtada, MD, Haffajee, Charles, MD, Sacher, Frédéric, MD, Lellouche, Nicolas, MD, Miyazaki, Shinsuke, MD, Forclaz, Andrei, MD, Jadidi, Amir S., MD, Hocini, Mélèze, MD, Ritter, Phillipe, MD, Clementy, Jacques, MD, Haïssaguerre, Michel, MD, Orlov, Michael, MD, PhD, Jaïs, Pierre, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Theoretically, the use of electroanatomical mapping systems may reduce radiation exposure, while three-dimensional rotational atriography (3DATG) may increase exposure. Anatomical representation and image registration using 3DATG are likely to be superior, but the net clinical benefit of either system is unknown. Objective The purpose of this prospective randomized two-center study was to compare the procedural and clinical outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated by catheter ablation using either three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical mapping (Carto) or 3DATG. Methods From November 2007 to November 2008, 91 consecutive patients with AF (mean age 58 ± 10 years; 63% paroxysmal AF, 37% persistent AF) from two centers (Bordeaux and Boston) were randomized to ablation using either 3DATG (44 patients) or Carto (47 patients). Results Of the 47 left atrial shells acquired with 3DATG, one was uninterpretable. There was no difference in total radiofrequency applications (72 ± 23 vs. 79 ± 33 minutes, respectively, P = .296), procedural duration (232 ± 65 vs. 218 ± 67 minutes; P = .335), fluroroscopic duration (75 ± 28 vs. 67 ± 26 minutes; P = .151), or radiation exposure (71,810 ± 42,954 vs. 68,009 ± 38,345 mGy cm2 ; P = .719) between procedures performed with 3DATG or Carto. After a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 months, there was no difference in clinical outcome using either Carto or 3DATG concerning total arrhythmia recurrence (34% versus 38%; P = .668) or AF recurrence (20% vs. 15%; P = .555). Conclusion Three-dimensional ATG-guided AF ablation has similar radiation exposure and procedural and outcome characteristics compared with Carto-guided ablation. The ease of use and accurate 3D representation of the left atrium make 3DATG a reasonable alternative to conventional 3D electroanatomical mapping systems, however, without advanced mapping functions.
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.12.020