Hepatic vascular flow measurements by phase contrast MRI and doppler echography: A comparative and reproducibility study
Purpose: To directly compare and study the variability of parameters related to hepatic blood flow measurements using 3 T phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI) and Doppler ultrasound (US). Materials and Methods: Nine healthy subjects were studied. Blood velocities and flow rate measurem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2010-03, Vol.31 (3), p.579-588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose:
To directly compare and study the variability of parameters related to hepatic blood flow measurements using 3 T phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI) and Doppler ultrasound (US).
Materials and Methods:
Nine healthy subjects were studied. Blood velocities and flow rate measurements were performed in the portal vein and the proper hepatic artery. MR studies were performed using a 3 T imager. Gradient‐echo fast phase contrast sequences were used with both cardiac and respiratory gating. MR and Doppler flow parameters were extracted and compared. Two methods of calculation were used for Doppler flow rate analysis.
Results:
Compared to Doppler US, PC‐MRI largely underestimated hepatic flow data with lower variability and higher reproducibility. This reproducibility was more pronounced in the portal vein than in the proper hepatic artery associated with poorer velocity correlations. Total hepatic flow values were 1239 ± 223 mL/min and 1595 ± 521 mL/min for PC‐MRI and Doppler US, respectively.
Conclusion:
Free‐breathing PC‐MRI can provide reliable noninvasive measurement of hepatic flow parameters compared to Doppler US. The MR technique could help to improve Doppler flow calculations, thereby allowing standardization of protocols, particularly for applications in disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:579–588. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.22079 |