Meta‐analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
Summary Aim : To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta‐analysis of randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials. Methods : In a first step, a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2003-05, Vol.17 (10), p.1247-1261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Aim : To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta‐analysis of randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials.
Methods : In a first step, a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non‐randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre‐operative transarterial chemotherapy, post‐operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy.
Results : Only post‐operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6–36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2–47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7–40.8%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2813 1365-2036 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01580.x |