Meta‐analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Summary Aim : To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta‐analysis of randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials. Methods : In a first step, a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2003-05, Vol.17 (10), p.1247-1261
Hauptverfasser: Mathurin, P., Raynard, B., Dharancy, S., Kirzin, S., Fallik, D., Pruvot, F.‐R., Roumilhac, D., Canva, V., Paris, J.‐C., Chaput, J.‐C., Naveau, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Aim : To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta‐analysis of randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials. Methods : In a first step, a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non‐randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre‐operative transarterial chemotherapy, post‐operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy. Results : Only post‐operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6–36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2–47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7–40.8%; P 
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01580.x