Homeopathy: what does the “best” evidence tell us?

Objective: To evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of homeopathy. Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (generally considered to be the most reliable source of evidence) was searched in January 2010. Study selection: Cochrane reviews with the term “homeopathy”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2010-04, Vol.192 (8), p.458-460
1. Verfasser: Ernst, Edzard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of homeopathy. Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (generally considered to be the most reliable source of evidence) was searched in January 2010. Study selection: Cochrane reviews with the term “homeopathy” in the title, or keywords were considered. Protocols of reviews were excluded. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction: Each of the six reviews was examined for specific subject matter; number of clinical trials reviewed; total number of patients involved; and authors’ conclusions. The reviews covered the following conditions: cancer, attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder, asthma, dementia, influenza and induction of labour. Data synthesis: The findings of the reviews were discussed narratively (the reviews’ clinical and statistical heterogeneity precluded meta‐analysis). Conclusions: The findings of currently available Cochrane reviews of studies of homeopathy do not show that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo.
ISSN:0025-729X
1326-5377
DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03585.x