Homeopathy: what does the “best” evidence tell us?
Objective: To evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of homeopathy. Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (generally considered to be the most reliable source of evidence) was searched in January 2010. Study selection: Cochrane reviews with the term “homeopathy”...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical journal of Australia 2010-04, Vol.192 (8), p.458-460 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of homeopathy.
Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (generally considered to be the most reliable source of evidence) was searched in January 2010.
Study selection: Cochrane reviews with the term “homeopathy” in the title, or keywords were considered. Protocols of reviews were excluded. Six articles met the inclusion criteria.
Data extraction: Each of the six reviews was examined for specific subject matter; number of clinical trials reviewed; total number of patients involved; and authors’ conclusions. The reviews covered the following conditions: cancer, attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder, asthma, dementia, influenza and induction of labour.
Data synthesis: The findings of the reviews were discussed narratively (the reviews’ clinical and statistical heterogeneity precluded meta‐analysis).
Conclusions: The findings of currently available Cochrane reviews of studies of homeopathy do not show that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0025-729X 1326-5377 |
DOI: | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03585.x |