Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach

Abstract Background This study examined outcomes of laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a community hospital setting. Methods A community health care system cancer registry was reviewed retrospectively (2004–2007) for rectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Primary end point...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2010-05, Vol.199 (5), p.599-603
Hauptverfasser: Sambasivan, Chitra N., M.D, Deveney, Karen E., M.D, Morris, Katherine T., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background This study examined outcomes of laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a community hospital setting. Methods A community health care system cancer registry was reviewed retrospectively (2004–2007) for rectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Primary end points were rates of recurrence and survival. Results Both open and laparoscopic resection groups had similar demographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics. Most patients in the open resection and laparoscopic resection populations experienced no recurrence (79% vs 83%, respectively; P = .5). Overall, the groups had similar mean (88% vs 96%, respectively; P = .4) and disease-free (21 and 23 months, respectively; P = .5) survival. Conclusions In a community hospital setting, laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer was found to be as safe and effective as open resection in selected patients.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.006