SEEN BUT NOT HEARD? CHILDREN IN CLINICAL TRIALS
Although a body of law relating to medical treatment of children exists, the law is relatively undeveloped regarding clinical research. In this article, I consider the implications of the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004. I argue that young people's right to self-deter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical law review 2010, Vol.18 (1), p.1-27 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although a body of law relating to medical treatment of children exists, the law is relatively undeveloped regarding clinical research. In this article, I consider the implications of the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004. I argue that young people's right to self-determination may not be adequately protected. In addition, I explore the implications of a 'direct positive benefit test', which may prove unduly restrictive of some types of paediatric research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0967-0742 1464-3790 |
DOI: | 10.1093/medlaw/fwp024 |