Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

We did a retrospective review and follow-up examina tion to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and out come of patients who developed loss of motion after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Two hundred forty-four patients with a minimum fol lowup of 1 year were reviewed. L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 1992-09, Vol.20 (5), p.499-506
Hauptverfasser: Harner, Christopher D., Irrgang, James J., Paul, Jonathan, Dearwater, Steven, Fu, Freddie H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We did a retrospective review and follow-up examina tion to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and out come of patients who developed loss of motion after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Two hundred forty-four patients with a minimum fol lowup of 1 year were reviewed. Loss of motion (defined as a loss of extension of more than I0° or flexion of less than 125°) was identified in 27 patients for an overall incidence of 11.1%. Factors associated with loss of motion included acute reconstruction (less than 1 month from initial injury), male sex, and concomitant medial collateral ligament repair or posterior oblique ligament reefing or both. Twenty-one patients required surgery to regain their motion; three patients required a second procedure. Twenty-one of 27 patients with loss of motion under went a detailed followup and were compared with 24 randomly chosen controls who had a normal range of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. At followup, patients who experienced loss of motion had a significant decrease in noninvolved to involved knee extension and flexion compared to the control patients. There was no difference between our patients and the controls regarding patellofemoral problems, anterior knee laxity, and functional strength. Sixty- seven percent of patients with loss of motion had a good or excellent result in comparison to 80% of the controls.
ISSN:0363-5465
1552-3365
DOI:10.1177/036354659202000503