Measuring antioxidants in tree species in the natural environment: from sampling to data evaluation

Biochemical measurements of antioxidants and protective pigments have been successfully introduced as markers of environmental stress in field studies (mainly forest studies). A guideline for field sampling and analysis methods is required to allow better comparison of data from different studies. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental botany 2003-06, Vol.54 (387), p.1505-1510
Hauptverfasser: Tausz, Michael, Wonisch, Astrid, Grill, Dieter, Morales, Domingo, Jiménez, Maria Soledad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Biochemical measurements of antioxidants and protective pigments have been successfully introduced as markers of environmental stress in field studies (mainly forest studies). A guideline for field sampling and analysis methods is required to allow better comparison of data from different studies. The present review paper recommends HPLC methods for the analysis of ascorbate and glutathione (in oxidized and reduced form), tocopherols, and chloroplast pigments. Methodological variations are substantially lower (coefficients of variance of repeated extractions typically 4–9%) than biological variations of field samples (typical variation coefficients 8–36%), hence special emphasis is put on considerations of sampling standardization in the field with respect to sample time (seasonal and diurnal) and representative sampling of individuals and tissues. Following the suggestions in this paper would enable researchers to produce results that could be compared with those of several forest studies on conifers published in recent years. A larger data‐set available for multivariate statistical evaluations (e.g. principal component analysis and cluster analysis) will enhance the diagnostic value of such investigations.
ISSN:0022-0957
1460-2431
1460-2431
DOI:10.1093/jxb/erg175